- Messages
- 1,897
- Name
- mark
- Edit My Images
- No
Whist you guys were viewing I was asleep and when I awoke and logged on this morning, you were all turning in.
I had to rub my eyes to be sure that I had so many replies. Well I thank you each and all -
normally I would choose to do so individually but in this instance I'm sure you will understand.
However, I need to respond to some specific comments that you made.
IanDJ: The squarish crop removed superfluous image to the right -
not possible to predict where lightning would appear, so post-composed accordingly.
Trapper501: The tiny figure is my partner, Sandra.
Being an angel she was entirely safe.
Goldeeno: f/14 @ 1/8 @ iso 100 @ 28mm (equiv)
bonsyde: Indeed, I guess it just did not occur to me that a metal tripod might act as a lightning rod,
although aluminium is non-ferrous isn't it? (assuming it makes any difference if you're dead!) :shrug:
I had to rub my eyes to be sure that I had so many replies. Well I thank you each and all -
normally I would choose to do so individually but in this instance I'm sure you will understand.
However, I need to respond to some specific comments that you made.
IanDJ: The squarish crop removed superfluous image to the right -
not possible to predict where lightning would appear, so post-composed accordingly.
Trapper501: The tiny figure is my partner, Sandra.
Being an angel she was entirely safe.
Goldeeno: f/14 @ 1/8 @ iso 100 @ 28mm (equiv)
bonsyde: Indeed, I guess it just did not occur to me that a metal tripod might act as a lightning rod,
although aluminium is non-ferrous isn't it? (assuming it makes any difference if you're dead!) :shrug: