Lytro Illum

Messages
107
Name
Jolyon
Edit My Images
Yes
I got one of these recently after the price fell (again) mostly out of curiosity but also because of a potential commercial use for it.

I had heard that the *real* resolution wasn't that high even though the system claims to export 4 megapixel JPEG images.

So I did some analysis and research into this - seems no-one has actually calculated the *real* maximum output resolution of the camera before.

Long story short, the camera uses a 40 megapixel 1" sensor with an array of microlenses on top which generate little images 10x10 pixel images for each microlens. Each of these images is then essentially one pixel in your output image as each lens stores the results for the light landing on a single pixel (ie the microlens) from multiple angles.

Therefore the actual maximum *sharp* uninterpolated resolution of the Lytro Illum would appear to work out at 816 x 544 pixels, or just 0.4 megapixels.

It does mean that if you do want to get a TRUE 4 megapixel image out of a similar light field camera you'd need 400 megapixel sensor.

No doubt this is why Lytro kept the true resolution quiet for so long.

I've documented this more thoroughly on my blog but I'm not sure if it's appropriate to post a link here or not.
 
Yes - please. I'd love to read a bit more.
It certainly does export 4Mp images; which if they were actual pixels would be plenty good enough for most of my purposes.

The images I got in a test shoot were rather soft, but I put that down to poor ISO management on my part. It was an underground scene and although I used a tripod I let the ISO creep up to ISO 2500. I have never got around to re-borrowing it and trying again.
The main problem I had was with unusual artefacts from very bright light sources; it didn't behave like a conventional lens/sensor and the results didn't really float my boat. It would be interesting to see how a low ISO changed things.
 
Back
Top