LewisHall
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 567
- Name
- Lewis
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Some years ago, when I was in the market for a Macro lens, I had a play with the Sigma 105 and the Tamron 90 and was impressed with both. It was purely that a Tamron appeared on a 2nd hand shelf first that made me go for that over the Sigma. At the time, the Nikkor was way beyond my means. However, I now have the Nikkor which is a little sharper than the Tamron and is the current VR and AF-S version while my Tamron was the old screw driven version (no AF on the D3200).
If the lens is going to be devoted to Macro use (it's also great for portraits if you have the space to get far enough away from the subject with a crop sensor), the lack of AF isn't a huge problem and the older screw driven versions are relatively cheap. The lack of VR isn't a huge problem either, it (VR) is of limited value at Macro focal distances. Only problem is tracking a 2nd hand one down - I waited about 18 months for one to turn up locally!
Yeah tbh there aint no rush but am going to get one for my birthday in may. Its only when ever i go out to take pictures with my friend there always a few macro shots that i cant take etc and would like to do more stuff at home in the light box.