- Messages
- 8,757
- Name
- John
- Edit My Images
- No
Its odd how these types of discussions always seem to hinge, boil down to, be condensed into some commercially influenced caveat.
Ah but if you where shooting sports on film for the back page, time is of the essence, if you're shooting weddings for a ludicrous picture count on the whim of the happy couple memory cards are the only way to go.
But seriously.......who is.........well nobody, I mean, I know there are a few wedding shooters doing it but the expectation is not set at 500 minimum prints.
If 99% of film users don't shoot it commercially, is digital photography in any way relevant to film photography, apart from the obvious similarities in actually shooting the things.
Ah but if you where shooting sports on film for the back page, time is of the essence, if you're shooting weddings for a ludicrous picture count on the whim of the happy couple memory cards are the only way to go.
But seriously.......who is.........well nobody, I mean, I know there are a few wedding shooters doing it but the expectation is not set at 500 minimum prints.
If 99% of film users don't shoot it commercially, is digital photography in any way relevant to film photography, apart from the obvious similarities in actually shooting the things.