1. gramps

    gramps

    Messages:
    32,401
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Same here.
     
  2. wanilson

    wanilson

    Messages:
    1,011
    Name:
    Ian
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Sorry for the late reply gramps we have been away for a few days, I've not noticed a pattern on the age when I've read the reports, but the majority stick at 400mm :)
     
    gramps likes this.
  3. chuckles

    chuckles

    Messages:
    4,428
    Name:
    Barry
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    What was the pattern? Older, more likely to stick - later models not sticking?
     
  4. wanilson

    wanilson

    Messages:
    1,011
    Name:
    Ian
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    ? o_O
     
  5. chuckles

    chuckles

    Messages:
    4,428
    Name:
    Barry
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Were they earlier versions of the lens or later editions.... I have a very early model which had to be checked for a F/W revision.

    Just wondered if earlier or later editions were prone to sticking - which is what I thought you meant by "pattern". If not, what do you mean by pattern?
     
  6. wanilson

    wanilson

    Messages:
    1,011
    Name:
    Ian
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Sorry Barry I did say I'd not noticed a pattern on the age that's why I was confused, I think you may have misread or misinterpreted it (y)
     
  7. chuckles

    chuckles

    Messages:
    4,428
    Name:
    Barry
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Not to worry - I think I jumbled up some thinking by not reading bits of this thread again.
     
  8. Malfis

    Malfis

    Messages:
    665
    Name:
    Malcolm
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    macvisual, davys, foggy4ever and 2 others like this.
  9. foggy4ever

    foggy4ever

    Messages:
    5,840
    Name:
    Storm Trooper
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Just bought one of these from Phil-D yesterday, very impressed so far but yet to test in anger so to speak which will be at YWP next weekend.I don't expect it to be better than my current 300mm f/4 + tc and 70-200mm f/4 on 2 bodies but it will be much more versatile using a single body.
    I thought I'd have a quick test with the Nikon 1.4tc although it's rare I will use it it's nice to know it's a usable combination.

    [​IMG]200-500 1.4tc test 2 by Scott, on Flickr

    [​IMG]200-500 1.4tc test 1 by Scott, on Flickr
     
  10. Welshy74

    Welshy74

    Messages:
    115
    Name:
    Richard
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Thinking of getting this lens for rugby to go with my 70-200. Have seen a like new one for £979. Sigma 150-600 sport still on my mind also though
     
  11. gramps

    gramps

    Messages:
    32,401
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Constant f5.6 could be an advantage with the 200-500. :)
     
    Welshy74 likes this.
  12. foggy4ever

    foggy4ever

    Messages:
    5,840
    Name:
    Storm Trooper
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    macvisual and Welshy74 like this.
  13. wanilson

    wanilson

    Messages:
    1,011
    Name:
    Ian
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I thought I'd better update the progress of my 200-500mm after I sent it back to Nikon, as you know I received and accepted my quote on the 05-09-18, the status then changed to awaiting repair, it was still at this status until the 02-10-18 when I got an email saying my lens was ready for despatch and telling me where to make payment, I made the payment by PayPal the same day and received my lens back by DPD on the 04-10-18, so 29 days for the turn around, with no chasing Nikon up at any stage, but I must admit it did seem twice that long I was without the lens, now to wait for some better weather to give it a proper test, that could take more than 29 days lol:)
     
  14. gramps

    gramps

    Messages:
    32,401
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Glad you got it back okay and hope it is better than new!
    29 days is still too long IMHO ... my D500 was over 40 days so at least you didn't have to wait that long. :)
     
  15. wanilson

    wanilson

    Messages:
    1,011
    Name:
    Ian
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    It could well be gramps unfortunatly it will still have the same idiot on the end of it lol :D

    I did manage to get out with it today,I've not re-calibrated it for the body since it came back and it seems fine, funnily enough I've missed it more for it's close up capabilities than the reach :)

    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
     
    trevorbray, chuckles and gramps like this.
  16. chuckles

    chuckles

    Messages:
    4,428
    Name:
    Barry
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Still in love with this lens.... very overcast day but found these in France last week.

    [​IMG]

    Sunflowers by Barry Cant, on Flickr
     
    trevorbray and gramps like this.
  17. gramps

    gramps

    Messages:
    32,401
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Great for my wildlife even on heavily overcast days. :)

    [​IMG]
    Fox
    by Roger, on Flickr
     
  18. ocean336

    ocean336

    Messages:
    129
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Got all the shots of Puffins I could handle last year. Stayed on the Island for three days and shot Puffins. This year I shot some of the other birds, intending to spend my time chasing the Short-Eared Owl. He never appeared until dusk on the last night. 500_2135 copy.jpg 500_2262 copy.jpg 500_1992.jpg
     
  19. Welshy74

    Welshy74

    Messages:
    115
    Name:
    Richard
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  20. gramps

    gramps

    Messages:
    32,401
    Edit My Images:
    No
    ocean336 and Welshy74 like this.
  21. Welshy74

    Welshy74

    Messages:
    115
    Name:
    Richard
    Edit My Images:
    Yes

    Just seen the Panamoz page. Very tempting. Have you used them before?
     
  22. ocean336

    ocean336

    Messages:
    129
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  23. damianmkv

    damianmkv Uh oh, a fruit basket!

    Messages:
    5,857
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    i got my d500 + 16-80 from them. Received in 3 days, there was an issue with the lens which i sent them photos of on Saturday morning and the replacement arrived on Tuesday morning. Excellent service
     
    ocean336 likes this.
  24. gramps

    gramps

    Messages:
    32,401
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Lots of very positive reports on TP. :)
     
    ocean336 likes this.
  25. crieffy

    crieffy

    Messages:
    1,225
    Name:
    John Moncrieff
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Well my 200-500mm is still away at Nikon after the zoom got stuck for no apparent reason. Latest I heard a couple of weeks ago was that they were replacing part of the barrel. Not sure what to do when it comes back - I assume it may come back better than new as they probably calibrate and check everything?? I got drunk and bought a 200-400 one night and I'm loving that. I will probably compare them side by side and maybe keep the 200-500 for longer walks or flying away..
     
  26. gramps

    gramps

    Messages:
    32,401
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I had a 200-400 and hated it (Mk 1) the 200-500 is much better in every respect for me. :)
     
  27. crieffy

    crieffy

    Messages:
    1,225
    Name:
    John Moncrieff
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I love the 200-500 too, I also borrowed a 200-400 mk1 but didn’t like it so much as the mk2.
    Oddly enough, an hour after I posted - the 200-500 has just arrived back from Nikon!
     
    chuckles and gramps like this.
  28. gramps

    gramps

    Messages:
    32,401
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Well, disaster struck today! :(
    Having finished photographing a small group of Common Snipe I decided to pack up and put my 200-500 onto the hide shelf while I did so.
    Done it many times before but this time something caused it to move and it crashed down onto the concrete floor ... silly boy!
    It landed on the hood, which took the shock of the fall and cracked but came off resulting in scuff damage to the plastic front edge of the lens.
    Fortunately I took out accidental damage protection when I bought it from John Lewis so it's covered without raiding the house insurance but I will be lost without it while it's being repaired. :(
     
  29. johnnypanic

    johnnypanic

    Messages:
    3,502
    Name:
    John
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Sorry to hear that Gramps. At least you had the insurance.
     
    gramps likes this.
  30. Ganton Gunner

    Ganton Gunner

    Messages:
    461
    Name:
    peter
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Ouch not good Gramps I bet you do miss it.
    I am looking forward to getting to finally try mine out tomorrow :)
     
    gramps likes this.
  31. Ganton Gunner

    Ganton Gunner

    Messages:
    461
    Name:
    peter
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Last edited: Oct 20, 2018
    trevorbray and gramps like this.
  32. kingo15

    kingo15

    Messages:
    1,911
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  33. Ganton Gunner

    Ganton Gunner

    Messages:
    461
    Name:
    peter
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  34. kingo15

    kingo15

    Messages:
    1,911
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    chuckles, Malfis and Ganton Gunner like this.
  35. Ganton Gunner

    Ganton Gunner

    Messages:
    461
    Name:
    peter
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    not done a moon with the 200-500 and just saw the one above so just ran outside for a quick hand held shot :)
    [​IMG]500_1481 by peter staddon, on Flickr
     
    chuckles and trevorbray like this.
  36. markyboy.1967

    markyboy.1967

    Messages:
    7,869
    Name:
    Mark Molloy
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  37. toohuge

    toohuge

    Messages:
    211
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Sorry to hijack the thread - what was wrong with the 2-400?
     
  38. gramps

    gramps

    Messages:
    32,401
    Edit My Images:
    No
    It was prone to ghosting and really, really poor focus at maximum range ... Thom Hogan and others make mention of this : http://www.dslrbodies.com/lenses/ni...om-lens-reviews/nikon-200-400mm-f4g-af-s.html

    ... e continues this theme for a bit. :)
     
  39. Welshy74

    Welshy74

    Messages:
    115
    Name:
    Richard
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Ordered mine Friday. Can't wait. Any preferences on a rain cover? Attached to D500
     
  40. toohuge

    toohuge

    Messages:
    211
    Edit My Images:
    Yes

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice