Nikon D750 & D780
- Thread starter Joeturner11
- Start date
- Messages
- 23,633
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
Purely preference tbh there's no right or wrong. 50mm is popular due to it being closest to what the eyes see in terms of perspective (obviously we have a wider FOV due to having two eyes
) but a lot of people like 35mm, and even 28mm. 50mm is my preferred focal length for walkabout as I like to distance myself that little bit, but for landscapes it can be a bit restrictive. Mind you, and fixed focal length can be restrictive in the wrong/right scenario.Do you have a short zoom lens? If so take that out first and experiment to see what you like.
- Messages
- 5,813
- Edit My Images
- No
Purely preference tbh there's no right or wrong. 50mm is popular due to it being closest to what the eyes see in terms of perspective (obviously we have a wider FOV due to having two eyes
Do you have a short zoom lens? If so take that out first and experiment to see what you like.
I have nothing but a D750 & 70-200 2.8 at the moment!
- Messages
- 5,813
- Edit My Images
- No
It was when I ventured briefly to the dark side lol
- Messages
- 7,901
- Name
- Dave
- Edit My Images
- No
28mm all the way for me.
50mm is like using a telephoto and 35mm is... Well, just meh.
However, I have become accustomed to 28mm as a focal length because I use it (or equivalent in other formats) a lot. That's really the key to picking a single focal length. Using it enough to instinctively see pictures in its framing.
When you do stick a 28mm in someone's face they tend to think you are photographing something beyond them, because you're too close to get a picture of them!
- Messages
- 8,509
- Name
- Trevor
- Edit My Images
- No
35mm
Yep
- Messages
- 4,605
- Name
- Kris
- Edit My Images
- No
35mm for me too. Like that 70-200E, you just need to persevere with it
For quite some years now, I take just a body and 35 on holiday with me. Can snap the family moments along with any landscape. A 50 I could make do with and if needs be, stitch a few shots together for a wider perspective (I've done that quite a bit)
I will admit that this last 6 months I've used the 35 very little. Have been really getting to grips with the 58 and longer FL's. But if it's one lens...
For quite some years now, I take just a body and 35 on holiday with me. Can snap the family moments along with any landscape. A 50 I could make do with and if needs be, stitch a few shots together for a wider perspective (I've done that quite a bit)
I will admit that this last 6 months I've used the 35 very little. Have been really getting to grips with the 58 and longer FL's. But if it's one lens...
- Messages
- 8,444
- Edit My Images
- No
- Messages
- 9,590
- Edit My Images
- Yes
unless its a 28mm equiv Ipad pro 12.928mm all the way for me.
50mm is like using a telephoto and 35mm is... Well, just meh.
However, I have become accustomed to 28mm as a focal length because I use it (or equivalent in other formats) a lot. That's really the key to picking a single focal length. Using it enough to instinctively see pictures in its framing.
When you do stick a 28mm in someone's face they tend to think you are photographing something beyond them, because you're too close to get a picture of them!
- Messages
- 9,590
- Edit My Images
- Yes
oh and 35mm
- Messages
- 7,901
- Name
- Dave
- Edit My Images
- No
Well, obvs. Only fools use Apple products.unless its a 28mm equiv Ipad pro 12.9
- Messages
- 23,633
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
We're not all voyeuristic like you
- Messages
- 2,842
- Name
- thomas
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I would go for 35mm! A great focal lens on full frame camera!
I always read that argument without really understanding it. The other day I had the 85mm on and i was surpise how wihen i looked in the viewfinder the perpective was exactly the same to what i see with my eyes other that my FOV being cropped (I.e what i see in there is not bigger or smaller that what i see without the viewfinder). So i was wonderring if the "50mm is what you see with the eye" a bit of a myth and if the 85mm is maybe even closer to that? Or if this is because there is also the viewfinder magnification which came into consideration.
I tested it with my 24-120mm and where it's seem to be the same in the viewfinder and without the camera is even a bit past 85mm nearer 90mm!
50mm is popular due to it being closest to what the eyes see in terms of perspective (obviously we have a wider FOV due to having two eyes
I always read that argument without really understanding it. The other day I had the 85mm on and i was surpise how wihen i looked in the viewfinder the perpective was exactly the same to what i see with my eyes other that my FOV being cropped (I.e what i see in there is not bigger or smaller that what i see without the viewfinder). So i was wonderring if the "50mm is what you see with the eye" a bit of a myth and if the 85mm is maybe even closer to that? Or if this is because there is also the viewfinder magnification which came into consideration.
I tested it with my 24-120mm and where it's seem to be the same in the viewfinder and without the camera is even a bit past 85mm nearer 90mm!
- Messages
- 5,813
- Edit My Images
- No
Always use my sling when out and about - takes the weight off when using the 70-200!
- Messages
- 7,901
- Name
- Dave
- Edit My Images
- No
I own the 35mm f/2 D. It's really not as bad as the internet paints it. Plus it's really small and light making it ideal for a walkabout lens.
However, it's not 28mm, so if anyone's interested I am willing to stick it in the classifieds. Along with the other useless focal length lens I have, a matching 85mm f/1.8 D.
- Messages
- 1,672
- Name
- Andy
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Talking of straps, which is everyone using? I've just used the standard ones for years but was thinking of something a little better when carrying 2 cameras if possible. I never feel that confident that I can safely carry two and one might slip off my shoulder. Also, while shouldering one camera on my left side I always have a bruise on my hip bone where the camera sits all day 
Do all the dual straps attach to the tripod mounts? and are they really secure? I remember reading years ago about some horror stories of cameras dropping off them this way 
Also, I have the Sigma 1.4 35mm, its a beauty but as said a little weighty. I found the balance on the D750 nice though but then I also enjoy the 24-70 on there too! It can be had second hand for a little more money than a new 1.8G though which makes it a tough call if you don't mind buying second hand!
Do all the dual straps attach to the tripod mounts? and are they really secure? I remember reading years ago about some horror stories of cameras dropping off them this way Also, I have the Sigma 1.4 35mm, its a beauty but as said a little weighty. I found the balance on the D750 nice though but then I also enjoy the 24-70 on there too! It can be had second hand for a little more money than a new 1.8G though which makes it a tough call if you don't mind buying second hand!
Last edited:
- Messages
- 5,813
- Edit My Images
- No
Talking of straps, which is everyone using? I've just used the standard ones for years but was thinking of something a little better when carrying 2 cameras if possible. I never feel that confident that I can safely carry two and one might slip off my shoulder. Also, while shouldering one camera on my left side I always have a bruise on my hip bone where the camera sits all day
Also, I have the Sigma 1.4 35mm, its a beauty but as said a little weighty. I found the balance on the D750 nice though but then I also enjoy the 24-70 on there too! It can be had second hand for a little more money than a new 1.8G though which makes it a tough call if you don't mind buying second hand!
Im using a Black Rapid Cross Shot - no worries carrying the 70-200 with it. Although I attach it to the lens foot and not the camera. Peak Designs seems the most popular on here!
As for the 35mm, I guess any of them will feel light compared to the 70-200!
- Messages
- 5,813
- Edit My Images
- No
I own the 35mm f/2 D. It's really not as bad as the internet paints it. Plus it's really small and light making it ideal for a walkabout lens.
However, it's not 28mm, so if anyone's interested I am willing to stick it in the classifieds. Along with the other useless focal length lens I have, a matching 85mm f/1.8 D.
Definatly is quite a tiny little lens! How much would it be up for?
- Messages
- 23,633
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
I tried it out and I'm pretty sure I came to the conclusion that just over 50mm was close to how I see things, maybe it's different for some folk?
- Messages
- 2,393
- Name
- Nick / Sectionate
- Edit My Images
- No
A vote for 35mm here too - I really like mine and I am currently resisting the GAS to upgrade to the Sigma Art version
- Messages
- 8,509
- Name
- Trevor
- Edit My Images
- No
They tell me resistance is futile..
- Messages
- 2,393
- Name
- Nick / Sectionate
- Edit My Images
- No
I know. I have a two wait tomorrow evening before a train to Bristol; something it trying to nudge a thought about what to do with this time
- Messages
- 1
- Edit My Images
- No
I have just upgraded my camera body to the D750 and I'm wondering which lens (either zoom or prime) you would recommend for landscape? I am pretty new to landscape so something in the mid price bracket would be best.
John
John
- Messages
- 23,633
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
18-35mm G is my most used landscape lens. Lightweight and very sharp.
- Messages
- 7,331
- Name
- Graham
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Welcome and you'll enjoy the d750.
My goto lens is the Irix 15mm F2.4, little distortion, can take rear and front filters.
Price is reasonable too. Find my photos on this thread and click thru to Flickr and search for land/seascape shots.
- Messages
- 7,901
- Name
- Dave
- Edit My Images
- No
- Messages
- 2,937
- Name
- Phil
- Edit My Images
- Yes
16-35 f4 for me.