Nikon D750 & D780
- Thread starter Joeturner11
- Start date
- Messages
- 4,605
- Name
- Kris
- Edit My Images
- No
It’s my least used lens but not so bad that I don’t use it, otherwise I’d have gotten rid by now. My 35G & 58G are simply superb in terms of accuracy at all distances. It seems the 85 isn’t so good at closer working distances. Yet yesterday it nailed every shot in a couple of sequences of my 2 year old running straight at me on a couple of occasions. The 58 isn’t quick enough generally to do that!
It doesn’t seem to be AF cross-type dependent either, there’s no real logic to it. It could be just copy variation?
I’ll review the shots later that I took yesterday with it and give it some use over the next few weeks. I tend to get up close with my everyday subjects so dont use it so much, but have a few lifestyle shoots coming up where it will be used a lot. Certainly no problems with contrast though, is as good as anything I’ve used in that respect. Still, the 105 will get bought in the next year.
- Messages
- 1,672
- Name
- Andy
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I know how you feel, what you’ve just described is what was happening with my Sigma 35. At times it was spot on, then others it was all over the place. No rhyme or reason and got to the point where I was losing confidence in it. Tried micro adjustment when the 750s turned up and they both had the same adjustment (-6 If I remember correctly) and it’s spot on now. I was shooting into the light at 1.4 yesterday and was still hitting it spot on. I’d forgotten just how nice it is!
- Messages
- 4,605
- Name
- Kris
- Edit My Images
- No
Just reviewed my images from yesterday and accuracy is poor, more noticeable as haven’t used it much lately. I did faff with MA values initially, it it’s not that. It’s strange in that it’s not the light either, it’s missed shots in good light at base ISO. There’s a sequence inside where the middle shot is ok but the two either side, not.
Going to have a play on the 610 body to see if it is the 750. Yet the other night for the family shoot I posted above, it was fine?? Might be the excuse needed to help fund a 105.
- Messages
- 1,672
- Name
- Andy
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Is there anything else that could’ve at play? Obviously the group shot from the other day was a stationary subject, was the sequence a moving one did you say? Is it the AF speed that’s letting it down more than its accuracy?
Trying the 610 May be a good idea though just to rule the body out. Especially if you are getting a 105 then finding you’re having similar issues, that would be disheartening to say the least!
Trying the 610 May be a good idea though just to rule the body out. Especially if you are getting a 105 then finding you’re having similar issues, that would be disheartening to say the least!
- Messages
- 4,605
- Name
- Kris
- Edit My Images
- No
Nope, defo the lens. It misses with stationary shots, most from yesterday it seems. Always shoot people 1/250 or above so no movement, plainly AF inaccuracies. Wonder whether a service could help, I did buy it secondhand 3 years ago.
Did consider AF speed to lock on but I noticed it and made an effort to try different AF points etc.
Last edited:
- Messages
- 5,813
- Edit My Images
- No
The Sun is back... and therefore time to bore people with more pics of Brendan!
Sam & Brendan by Justin Akehurst, on Flickr
Brendan Head by Justin Akehurst, on Flickr
Sam & Brendan by Justin Akehurst, on FlickrBrendan Head by Justin Akehurst, on Flickr
- Messages
- 4,605
- Name
- Kris
- Edit My Images
- No
I’ve been playing with the 85 today. For some reason the default fine tune was set at +11, I don’t ever recall doing that. Anyway, setting that to zero and settling on something new for the 85 has buggered everything else up, but I have faffed and got them back to somewhere very close. No shooting charts this time, just real world trials and error.
- Messages
- 4,605
- Name
- Kris
- Edit My Images
- No
- Messages
- 7,897
- Name
- Dave
- Edit My Images
- No
Why is it that when I take a series of shots with slightly different framings the best composition is always the only one where I miss focus? 
This one is in focus. And for a superzoom it's not f2.8 zoom standard but not too bad on the detail front to my uncritical eyes.
This one is in focus. And for a superzoom it's not f2.8 zoom standard but not too bad on the detail front to my uncritical eyes.
- Messages
- 4,605
- Name
- Kris
- Edit My Images
- No
Remember I said the 85 was fine with a running 2 year year old coming at you (with bubbles too lol)?!
- Messages
- 1,672
- Name
- Andy
- Edit My Images
- Yes
So you’ve managed to sort it then? Did I read it right that you reset the +11 for the 85 and it reset for other lenses too?
- Messages
- 4,605
- Name
- Kris
- Edit My Images
- No
Not completely sure yet that it is solved but seemed much better. I swear it does this too, as have had shoots where it's completely fine.
There's two changes in MA, a default setting which must act as a starting point. It's always been set to zero as far as I was concerned, but for some reason was set at +11. Still doesn't;t make complete sense as I deducted that from my values that I had written down and it wasn't right. I'll make an effort to use it this next couple of weeks in real world scenarios and see how it fares.If it plays up, I'll have it serviced. When it is right, it's a great lens..
Last edited:
- Messages
- 4,605
- Name
- Kris
- Edit My Images
- No
It's THE dream lens G. Soooooo good, seriously big and heavy. But, it's the king of bokeh!
Last edited:
- Messages
- 5,813
- Edit My Images
- No
I don’t want to say I told you.... but you’ll
get used to it
So yes.. you are right!
Zoom position aside the 2.8e is just so good. The VRII was really good, but this lens is really really really good!
IMO it is sharper, better rendering, nicer colours and AF is a step up from the VRII. And the focus breathing issue has been solved.
The zoom ring does not feel as nice as the VRII but overall it is a better lens.
- Messages
- 4,605
- Name
- Kris
- Edit My Images
- No
- Messages
- 4,605
- Name
- Kris
- Edit My Images
- No
- Messages
- 23,617
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
I'm really impressed tbh, images need very little PP and the detail is great. The 9fps came in handy too. One thing I did notice (which has been reported on the D5) is that if the subject is quite small in the frame, is dark/in shadows and the background is very busy the AF can pick up the background rather than the subject. Very rare tbf, and I'm not sure if the D750 would have done the same (I got speaking to a guy with the D810 and he complained of his doing it) and it might have just been the conditions (shaded road with very bright busy background) as the last times I've done the marathon the weather's been a bit pants so not as much dark and light. But I thought it worth mentioning
At 9fps the odd missed shot isn't going to hurt But overall I'm very happy. I'm just going through the pics now for Arthritis research and I'm really happy with the detail and colours, very pleasing
- Messages
- 4,605
- Name
- Kris
- Edit My Images
- No
I'm really impressed tbh, images need very little PP and the detail is great. The 9fps came in handy too. One thing I did notice (which has been reported on the D5) is that if the subject is quite small in the frame, is dark/in shadows and the background is very busy the AF can pick up the background rather than the subject. Very rare tbf, and I'm not sure if the D750 would have done the same (I got speaking to a guy with the D810 and he complained of his doing it) and it might have just been the conditions (shaded road with very bright busy background) as the last times I've done the marathon the weather's been a bit pants so not as much dark and light. But I thought it worth mentioning
But overall I'm very happy. I'm just going through the pics now for Arthritis research and I'm really happy with the detail and colours, very pleasing
Is the AF markedly better than the 750? How's the live view AF? Thanks for the info, interesting.
- Messages
- 23,617
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
Live view AF is as abysmal as ever. I don't think the D850's AF is markedly better tbh. Let's be honest, the D750's AF is already fantastic so how can it get massively better?
I do think AF is more reliable on the outer points than the D750, but that's to be expected due to the cross type sensors. I've not tried the D850 in low light yet, but overall it's not struck me as a noticeable difference. Maybe when I go back to using the D750 I'll see more of a difference. I certainly notice that the D750's viewfinder is smaller when I go back to it. I never found it small before, but it's certainly noticeably smaller than the D850, but then I guess this will be true of all Nikon DSLRs now
- Messages
- 23,617
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
Really like this, nice tones and colour.
- Messages
- 1,106
- Name
- Paul
- Edit My Images
- No
The tulip fairy popped by... by Paul, on Flickr
My dad passed away early last week, 4 months shy of 102. A long life, well lived; survived by 51 children, grandchildren and great grandchildren. Somewhere along the way we had a night time delivery from the tulip fairy. Much appreciated.
- Messages
- 1,106
- Name
- Paul
- Edit My Images
- No
Finally! Spring has sprung; the warm weather has arrived with a vengeance. Beautiful day out so after mowing the lawn I wandered the neighbourhood to look at the cherry blossoms as our little subdivision has one street that is just full of multiflora cherry trees. However, I couldn't resist taking a photo of these tulips. They were just begging for someone to take their photo.
It's spring! by Paul, on Flickr
It's spring! by Paul, on Flickr
Last edited:
- Messages
- 5,813
- Edit My Images
- No
18-35 arriving today!
Been reading some articles on how to get more dramatic and stand out wide angle shots so let’s see how this goes!
Got myself a B+W protection filter for the 70-200 too. As filters go this one is damn good! Better than the Hoya HD one I had on the VR2.
Been reading some articles on how to get more dramatic and stand out wide angle shots so let’s see how this goes!
Got myself a B+W protection filter for the 70-200 too. As filters go this one is damn good! Better than the Hoya HD one I had on the VR2.
Last edited:
- Messages
- 5,813
- Edit My Images
- No
No problem! First one is quite good as gives you comparisons and how different a shot can look!
https://www.digitalphotomentor.com/...sing-a-wide-angle-lens-and-how-to-avoid-them/
https://improvephotography.com/33932/10-tips-shooting-wide-angle/
https://petapixel.com/2017/09/08/10-tips-using-extreme-wide-angle-lenses-landscape-photography/
- Messages
- 4,463
- Name
- Barry
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Mrs. Chuckles is the custodian of the D750 - I get to use it now and then. We went to Malta last week when it was mine for the day (usual weapon of choice for me is the D800)
Valetta_1 by Barry Cant, on Flickr
Valetta_2 by Barry Cant, on Flickr
Valetta_3 by Barry Cant, on Flickr
Valetta_1 by Barry Cant, on Flickr
Valetta_2 by Barry Cant, on Flickr
Valetta_3 by Barry Cant, on Flickr
- Messages
- 7,897
- Name
- Dave
- Edit My Images
- No
- Messages
- 23,617
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
- Messages
- 1,989
- Name
- Adam
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Can someone give any info of best SD cards for the D750.. I understand it doesn't benefit from UHS-U3 and can only use U1. Are these cards ok? I want two the same.. and they are reasonably priced.
https://www.mymemory.co.uk/kingston-64gb-sd-card-sdxc-uhs-i-u3-90mb-s.html#reviews
Any other ones to consider?
https://www.mymemory.co.uk/kingston-64gb-sd-card-sdxc-uhs-i-u3-90mb-s.html#reviews
Any other ones to consider?
I typically buy SanDisk ExtremePro - but I see they are twice the price of those. However for that price I'd go for SanDisk Ultra at £21.98 (from the same website)
- Messages
- 23,617
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
Depends how you shoot. If you don't do burst shooting and therefore not going to fill the buffer up then pretty much any card will do. If you do burst shooting then a faster card should be better as the D750 doesn't have the biggest buffer. That being said, even with the Sandisk Extreme Pro 95mb/s it still slows to about 1 fps after the buffer is full (roughly 12 shots 14 bit lossless compressed RAW). Maybe this will help
http://bestphotographygear.com/best-memory-cards-nikon-d750/
- Messages
- 1,989
- Name
- Adam
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Thanks, I do the odd wedding, but only shoot at continuous low when I have to. Maybe get the Sandisk Ultras..