- Messages
- 9,594
- Edit My Images
- Yes
purely in IQ terms would there be much in it?
interestingAt low ISO`s the d5500 I owned with 24mp no AA filter was better than d700 I also owned.
Very high detail on the d5500
interesting
interesting
purely in IQ terms would there be much in it?
understand that but why did you suggest D700?Twice the MP and no AA. Pretty obvious youd get more detail.
thanks Ned for your answerThat's a pretty daft question, even by your standards
Waaaaay to many unstated variables to even contemplate giving an answer.
understand that but why did you suggest D700?
oh sorry I forgot to mention the purpose for taking daylight photos of cats flowers and canals etc
I know Steve,just wondered if the FF would be a choice that might give a different look to what I've had before sortaNot being funny, any camera from the last 50 years can take a picture of cats, flowers and canals in daylight.
I know Steve,just wondered if the FF would be a choice that might give a different look to what I've had before sorta
With the d700 you'll lose out on MP. What you gain is a pro build, fantastic AF, shallow dof and very good high iso, the files are really nice. You can still print massive files from a d700.
And a lovely big viewfinder. I love FF viewfinders.
I know Steve,just wondered if the FF would be a choice that might give a different look to what I've had before sorta
my favourite was the D750 ,I liked the files I got from that with the 85mm 1.8 and the old Nikon 80-210,ive liked some of the files from all the cameras but the D750 had thee most pleasing to my eyeDidn't you say the other day that you've owned 28 different cameras in recent time? Did you find any of them giving you a look that you liked? Alternatively, if you want a really big viewfinder have you considered trying medium format film?
I don't think I'm adventurous enough Steve re the mfDidn't you say the other day that you've owned 28 different cameras in recent time? Did you find any of them giving you a look that you liked? Alternatively, if you want a really big viewfinder have you considered trying medium format film?
oh sorry I forgot to mention the purpose for taking daylight photos of cats flowers and canals etc
You might be able to get wider angles and less DOF easier/cheaper with FF.I know Steve,just wondered if the FF would be a choice that might give a different look to what I've had before sorta
I sold my D750 plus lenses to go into a pot for my new car. I recently bought a D600 for half the price so a good saving and it still has the very good Sony 24.3mp sensor.I can't afford another D750 though,thats why I thought of the D700,ive been impressed with quite a lot from the D3300 also
The lower end DX Nikons can be fiddly and frustrating to use if you've been used to a higher end model due to lack of physical controls, they have pokey little viewfinders and won't use screw driven lenses. Nothing wrong with their sensors though.I can't afford another D750 though,thats why I thought of the D700,ive been impressed with quite a lot from the D3300 also
I know Steve,just wondered if the FF would be a choice that might give a different look to what I've had before sorta
You don't need to be adventurous to shoot MF film, I reckon you could easily buy a system and shoot a fair number of rolls for the same amount you've probably lost in buying and selling one of those digital cameras. The idea behind trying MF is that it's something different to spark your imagination. Simply buying yet another digital camera, which will all deliver excellent results regardless of the make/model, won't do that.I don't think I'm adventurous enough Steve re the mf