- Messages
- 2,503
- Name
- Andrew
- Edit My Images
- No
Well just sold my Panasonic 100-400 lens. It was a great lens but TBH I just wasn't using it that much. With light levels (especially at this time of the year) being relatively low, where I usually do most of my bird photography is in shadow most of the time, and I just felt that at F5.6-6.3 at the long end, it was forcing the ISO's northwards of 4000-6400, where both the EM1 MKII and my Panasonic G9 don't really excel. I've found that instead I've either been using my Olympus 50-140 F2.8 (with and with T/C) or my Olympus 300 mm F4 to gain me the extra stop of light. I know that when I add the T/C to the 300 mm F4 it becomes an F5.6 but I use this lens most of the time without the T/C (unless the light is really good).
As good as the 100-400 was (and is), with me having the other lenses, I just found it was staying at home, so might as well get some money back on it. Purchased it mid 2016 from Jessops for £1,249 and just sold it for £1,099, so not too much of a loss over 2 years. I know the zoom had the convenience especially over the prime, but couldn't justify keeping both of them, and TBH, you would have to pry the 300 mm F4 from my cold dead hands![Big Grin :D :D]()
As good as the 100-400 was (and is), with me having the other lenses, I just found it was staying at home, so might as well get some money back on it. Purchased it mid 2016 from Jessops for £1,249 and just sold it for £1,099, so not too much of a loss over 2 years. I know the zoom had the convenience especially over the prime, but couldn't justify keeping both of them, and TBH, you would have to pry the 300 mm F4 from my cold dead hands