- Messages
- 7,842
- Name
- Mike
- Edit My Images
- No
I've now started writing the tutorial and have a quick question...
Does everyone know the difference between a silk and a scrim, or do I need to explain that?
Never heard of them!
I've now started writing the tutorial and have a quick question...
Does everyone know the difference between a silk and a scrim, or do I need to explain that?
I think a scrim is used to reduce output while a silk is diffusion material. Depending on material both can be made to do both jobs. Maybe.I thought they were interchangeable terms
In the TV & Film world scrims are usually mesh gauze type thing which fit on the front of the fixture. They have varying size of mesh too. A silk is a fabric which can be used to diffuse or reflect or sometimes to gently reduce the fall off, depending on how they are rigged. Scrims come in diameters to fit the various lamp heads, silks can be as big as 40' x 40' ....I've now started writing the tutorial and have a quick question...
Does everyone know the difference between a silk and a scrim, or do I need to explain that?
Scrims also come in graduated or 1/2.Scrims come in diameters to fit the various lamp heads, silks can be as big as 40' x 40' ....
I'll explain it thenDefinitely worth explaining.. I regularly get them the wrong way round.
Only interchangeable in YouTube videos and online tutorials from "experts" - and from people with poor command of the English language, e.g. AmericansI thought they were interchangeable terms
You have now....Never heard of them!
Not much correction needed.I think a scrim is used to reduce output while a silk is diffusion material. Depending on material both can be made to do both jobs. Maybe.
Now I'll wait for Garry to correct me.
Not far out. The only correction I would make to that is that scrims can be as big as you like too, in the film industry they are used almost as a neutral density gel, to reduce the amount of light falling on the subject as well as to diffuse the light, and this is done when there is a need to overpower the ambient light.In the TV & Film world scrims are usually mesh gauze type thing which fit on the front of the fixture. They have varying size of mesh too. A silk is a fabric which can be used to diffuse or reflect or sometimes to gently reduce the fall off, depending on how they are rigged. Scrims come in diameters to fit the various lamp heads, silks can be as big as 40' x 40' ....
In my knives shoot, I used a silk instead of a softbox, lit unevenly, and without stretching it over a frame, in order to achieve a specific lighting effect.
done that myselfI used a silk instead of a softbox
done that toolit unevenly
Never done that.. intriguingand without stretching it over a frame
Only interchangeable in YouTube videos and online tutorials from "experts" - and from people with poor command of the English language, e.g. Americans
Not having it stretched over a frame is just another, additional way of getting the lighting uneven, also the light that reaches the subject is coming from more directions - I think it will make sense when you see the tutorial.done that myself
done that too
Never done that.. intriguing
Made it look a bit like Damascus steel...Same knife, lit with the silk.
A little bit yes...Made it look a bit like Damascus steel...
Totally digressing from knives for a second. ...I've been asked to photograph a friend and her horse sometime next year. I know nowt about horses other than that they can be stubborn and can lash out unexpectedly.did another video tutorial some time ago, on photographing horses. That one is all shot but on the back burner due to pressure of other work (new website development, business expansion etc) but should be ready soon-ish.
With a well trained horse and a GOOD rider, they're pretty predictable, and not only will they never deliberately hurt a human but they will also do their best to avoid hurting them, so you should be safe enough if you position yourself somewhere where the horse shouldn't be putting its feet...Totally digressing from knives for a second. ...I've been asked to photograph a friend and her horse sometime next year. I know nowt about horses other than that they can be stubborn and can lash out unexpectedly.
I'd very much like to see how to do a proper shoot of a horse and rider.
Thanks for that. Am I right in assuming that flash won't spook the horse (he's called Lennard!)With a well trained horse and a GOOD rider, they're pretty predictable, and not only will they never deliberately hurt a human but they will also do their best to avoid hurting them, so you should be safe enough if you position yourself somewhere where the horse shouldn't be putting its feet...
The main problem really is that unless you really know your subject, it's odds on that the feet will be in the wrong position, the ears will be wrong and everything else will be wrong too
The best advice I can give you is to
1. Get the owner to confirm that it's looking right before you take each shot (always make everything that's wrong someone else's fault )
2. Take lots of shots.
3. If you're using flash, get the horse very used to the noise that it makes slowly (start with the horse a long way away from the flash) before you start taking shots
View attachment 77113
This is by no means the best of the ones I've got, there are some in a fast canter with the legs well extended and just the right amount of subject blur, but this is one that's actually on my computer - most have been sent to someone else for PP
Thanks for that. Am I right in assuming that flash won't spook the horse (he's called Lennard!)
cu = close upI presume "cu" is cutout?
The handle looks up in the air on the first shot, ie blade heavy.
The silk definitely makes a difference though.
Some horses do get spooked, it depends on it's temperament and training. But personally (not that I'm an expert) I've found that a bit of conditioning works wonders, i.e. just fire the flash at low power, and a long way away, until it no longer reacts to the noise, and then gradually increase the power, and then gradually move the horse closer and closer. Some horse owners are idiots though, and instead of ignoring the horse when it spooks, they reassure it, which tell it that there is something to worry about... We used a couple of our Safari units, 600 Ws each, and although they don't notice the actual flash, the crack that it makes does bother some of them.Thanks for that. Am I right in assuming that flash won't spook the horse (he's called Lennard!)
I'm sure that Mike can help, he photographs a lot of horses.@mike weeks I hope Gary isn't upset at this intrusion into his thread. I was going to start a thread when the shoot is pencilled in, but saw the opportunity. It wo'nt be a paid shoot at all. She has the horse; I have the camera. I only have Canon 580 flash guns which will have to suffice.
Can I be cheeky and ask if you have any other horse shots available to view? I'll be quite open and say that I'm looking for ideas to copy!
Garry only gets upset when people mis-spell his name
I guess that's up to the client... but personally I think the "de-skilled" approach less than optimal for this particular subject.A little bit yes...
It isn't accurate and maybe it's a bit deceptive, but that's product photography for you
Nor are less reflective subjects as critical of softbox placement.On the actual Damascus steel products, and indeed on everything that isn't highly polished, it doesn't obviously reflect the structure of the silk.
Steven, I take your point and I don't necessarily disagree with you but...I guess that's up to the client... but personally I think the "de-skilled" approach less than optimal for this particular subject.
Nor are less reflective subjects as critical of softbox placement.
Don't get me wrong, I understand the what/why and I don't really have a problem w/ it...
The reality is that when
1. When the client is happy, I have to be happy
2. There are a large number of products, each requiring multiple shots, using a system that works well and efficiently and that makes the products look good is what matters
3. Take a look at the business forum here, there are loads of posts from people who think that they're pro product photographers who are asking how much to charge for product photography, and other people are telling them to charge silly cheap prices - which is perhaps fair enough because most of them haven't got a clue how to photograph any products anyway, but the fact of the matter is that clients (small ones at least) are being "educated" into believing that anyone and everyone can do product photography at a low price.
4. Amazon are now selling horrible LED light tents themselves (at inflated prices) so that their sellers can produce "professional" photos to sell their products on Amazon.
it, will really be almost as much about approach from a marketing perspective
Sorry but no, there are other people who could do that much better.This tutorial sounds better and better.
Would you consider doing one about pricing and negotiating at some point?
I am going to make this into a series of tutorials covering various aspects that are much more business-related
No, pressure of work...Has this tutorial been posted yet? Not sure where to look.