- Messages
- 4,518
- Name
- droj
- Edit My Images
- No
Well I've said it in the title, I think. My claim is that such a choice is clumsily materialistic, and lies outside any sensible artistic remit. How a photograph (a recording of light) is rendered is intrinsic to its value. Of course people can do what they want, but my argument is about artistic integrity of purpose. Culturally, the arbiter of the worth of something isn't how POPULAR it is, but how it hangs together. Gut feeling must trump affectation every time.
Canvas made valid sense as a substrate to PAINT on - but for printing photographs? Come on - stop faking it!
Canvas made valid sense as a substrate to PAINT on - but for printing photographs? Come on - stop faking it!
Last edited: