Post processing software poll

what post processing software do you most often use?

  • Total voters
    98
  • This poll will close: .
inquisitive_chap said:
For those LR Classic users, is there an option to 'hide' any of the side menus when viewing an image temporarily. IE. To create a 'distraction free' view?
Click to expand...
Like hitting “F” in Capture One?
 
inquisitive_chap said:
For those LR Classic users, is there an option to 'hide' any of the side menus when viewing an image temporarily. IE. To create a 'distraction free' view?
Click to expand...

Press "L" to dim the lights, the press it again to turn the lights off completely. One more time to turn the lights back on. On a PC that is, not sure about Apple.
 
Last edited:
Toonie said:
I still use Bridge & Photoshop as I have been doing for year’s, It does everything that I need & more. I did install Lightroom classic to try & uninstalled it & then went back to what I know.

Discovered the Lightroom catalogue the other day ….51 Gigabytes recovered hard drive space.
Click to expand...
How so the library only stores thumbnails, you still need the original image files that the library system points to.
 
Terrywoodenpic said:
How so the library only stores thumbnails, you still need the original image files that the library system points to.
Click to expand...
I have no idea how these things work Terry but it was in My Pictures folder on my C drive that i don't ever use & assumed that any left over files would be deleted when i un-installed but 51 gig did seem a little excessive to me, I do still have the original images on my D drive.
 
Toonie said:
I have no idea how these things work Terry but it was in My Pictures folder on my C drive that i don't ever use & assumed that any left over files would be deleted when i un-installed but 51 gig did seem a little excessive to me, I do still have the original images on my D drive.
Click to expand...
The library only points to the original files if you delete them they are gone. Even if you move a file lightroom loses track of them.
 
Last edited:
Pound Coin said:
Like hitting “F” in Capture One?
Click to expand...
Yes, but better still, I have two monitors and LR is designed to work with two so you can have the second monitor only display the image. You can also work this way with PS as well which allows me to have all of the palettes open on the second screen. It is also F for full screen in LR.

Dave
 
inquisitive_chap said:
Do you LR Classic users find that backing up the catalogue and presets and raw profiles etc is a hassle or have you found ways to automate or streamline all that?
Click to expand...


LrC has an automatic backup where you get to set the intervals, and it backs up when you close the software.
 
Agree. I am just really checking out other options. Essentially, I like the fact that LR (cloudy) has no hassle with catalogues, and a lovely UI and all the editing tools I am likely to need right now

I would prefer to not be worried about busting my cloud limit even though that is some time off.. I'll have a play with LR Classic when back from hols.

I suspect I may stay with LR (cloudy) until I fill it up and see by then how it's evolved
 
What is wrong with the catalogue. It stores the edit details and a previews which can be accessed much faster than reading the full file from disk. Because it does not store the full image file, the catalogue is not very large compared to the stored image files. As The Ancient Mariner has explained, backing up to the catalogue is automated so no hassle.

Dave
 
I just need to look into it. It's just something you don't need to think about with cloudy. Think I might need to backup presets, and preferences too? Not saying any of this that hard
 
I selected Lightroom Classic as I've used it for years, and it's my main cataloguing software for all my images, however, from a processing perspective my flow depends on what system I am using.

Canon R1 and R3
RAWs and JPEGs go straight into Lightroom Classic.

Hasselblad X2D II
I process the RAW file in Hasselblad's Phocus software as nothing else can come close to it in how it renders the colours and their noise reduction is insanely good. I then export to a 16-bit TIFF and then it goes into Lightroom Classic.

OM1 MK II
When shooting JPEG (sports) they go straight into Lightroom, but if I shoot RAW then they are processed in DxO PureRAW as they render the images much better than Lightroom. Again these are then exported and go into Lightroom Classic.

Fuji GFX100RF
JPEG files would go straight into Lightroom, but RAW files are processed in FujiFilm X RAW Studio, then exported as a TIFF and into Lightroom Classic.

It might seem like a pain but I've used Lightroom Classic for at least 10 years and it's pure muscle memory and I have no intention or desire to move away from it, over the last few years I've taken advantage of the student discount and my youngest is going to Uni in September so I'm good for another 4 years to continue that :ROFLMAO:

I'd prefer to process the RAW files in the application that renders the image, deals with noise etc, in the most effective way so I don't have any issue using Phocus and the others, the exception being that I've never really used Canon's Digital Photo Professional software, tried it years ago and couldn't see much of a difference and I hardly use the Canon's now and it would be for sport so would always be JPEG.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top