- Messages
- 163
- Edit My Images
- No
I asked this a couple of years back but wondering if things have changed.
How long did it take you to adjust?I used Lightroom until they went subscription only and then changed to DxO Photolab
I would have thought Photoshop to be on the list?
LR or LR Classic?I use LR for conventional photos, but On1 for IR.
I would say it's a pixel level editor, rather than a processing package.
As the Poll only accepts one option, it doesn't represent my use.
For colour files I load into DXO PL5 for minor tweaks like perspective & crop.
I then export to Affinity Photos to do further minor tweaks and maybe incorporate NIK software.
For my monochrome RAW files I import into Darktable (via Image Capture) to tweak and then export as .tiff as above.
Sounds lengthy but isn't really and only applies to those I feel need processing.
CheapskateFor decades, I've used nothing but Apple's built in "Preview". It has all the facilities I need.
View attachment 488929

I know what you mean. But the term post processing comes from a more accurate term post capture processing, it covers everything you do after taking the photo, which I think is accurate.Every RAW file needs processing, so 'post processing' to me means potentially altering the image/pixels after the RAW conversion.
An interesting list, but without Photoshop and ACR being in the list it is incomplete imho, and any results are unrepresentative of what options people may be using.
I've been using Adobe Camera Raw via Adobe Bridge for many years. That can be used on Jpegs and RAW files. Occasionally I go into Photoshop from ACR to do some further editing when needed.
As far Photoshop not being on the list of options, Photoshop can be a pixel editor, but also a global editor. With the ACR plugin, it can be a RAW processor as above, or you can use the Camera Raw plugin as an easy editor of a lot of settings, or as a filter on a layer.
I do have LightRoom, but don't need anything other than the RAW processing, so don't need to create catalogs, which use up space, and so prefer ACR.
So I am one of the 'Other's above.![]()
![]()
That's fair enough, but talking about anything to do with image editing/processing/post processing and not include Photoshop, and Camera Raw, if you are taking the time to differentiate the LightRoom versions, is puzzling to me.Sorry for not including more options. I picked those I thought would be most common and included an other option.
Polls generally get the same result!Sorry for not including more options. I picked those I thought would be most common and included an other option.
In total it took a while because I tried downloading various processing programs to see what suited me. Any software is going to be a change but some clicked with me more than others and DXO Photolab I found easier to get going with so I went with it. I don't do that much when I'm processing raw files and found it automated most of what I wanted to do well plus it has excellent noise reduction. I also liked their software pricing and update policies since they don't have a subscription version at all and they keep supporting camera models on older software revisions for a decent amount of time. I'd started trying to use CaptureOne but I was concerned with the way they seemed to be pushing subscriptions so I didn't want to risk getting trapped back in the same situation as Lightroom.How long did it take you to adjust?
I was trying it for panorama stitching recently and that was definitely my impression as well although I have seen it frequently recommended for photo processing.Isn't Affinity Photo more like Photoshop rather than Lightroom and it's on the list? I've never used it though, so just guessing.
Could the same be said for affinity?I would say it's a pixel level editor, rather than a processing package.
I do not understand this comment. I use LR Classic and never use the Cloud but store everything locally. I back up with a NAS.I think it's quite normal to get used to one system. I'm certainly that way.
I used to have an issue with subscription but have also become fine with that.
To be honest, if LR does develop it's local tab a bit (IE the bit that now allows you to keep your photos on your SSD and out the cloud), I'd have no cause to move. I only really edit my 3 star and above photos and only really want those in the cloud and there aren't tons of those. So it may be I never hit the storage limit and I'm worrying unnecessarily
I was referring to LR rather than LR ClassicI do not understand this comment. I use LR Classic and never use the Cloud but store everything locally. I back up with a NAS.
Dave
I was referring to LR rather than LR Classic
Although I was sorting of joking further up, for many of us, the application now called lightroom isn't really at all. I suspect Adobe thought their customer base would just move across, but most of us have no wish to do so. Calling it something else might have been better.
But the UI does seem really quite dated