- Messages
- 405
- Name
- michael
- Edit My Images
- Yes
For those that (like me) go back a few years - a question i keep asking myself , but cannot come up with an answer.
Before digital i used to develop my own black and white film so sharpness was a combination of lens in camera and lens in enlarger - the biggest prints i ever did were 8 x 10 inches. (had some great results with yashica mat 2 1/4 square and olympus om1 35mm) . Slide film we viewd mostly on a 'slide viewer' maybe 6 x 4 or thereabouts , patterson as i recall) With a projector and 'glass beaded screen' viewed from 10/12 ft all looked really sharp unless you got up really close. NOW
Digital on viewnx (nikon viewer) i can view complete image, 50% or 100% but those last two are really crops - i can see the images on the screen (full screen) and just like the close up on the projected screen shows less sharp .
What is the correlation between the old and the new - how can i judge sharpness of my old slides and prints against my computer screen?
Hope this is not a dumb question.
Before digital i used to develop my own black and white film so sharpness was a combination of lens in camera and lens in enlarger - the biggest prints i ever did were 8 x 10 inches. (had some great results with yashica mat 2 1/4 square and olympus om1 35mm) . Slide film we viewd mostly on a 'slide viewer' maybe 6 x 4 or thereabouts , patterson as i recall) With a projector and 'glass beaded screen' viewed from 10/12 ft all looked really sharp unless you got up really close. NOW
Digital on viewnx (nikon viewer) i can view complete image, 50% or 100% but those last two are really crops - i can see the images on the screen (full screen) and just like the close up on the projected screen shows less sharp .
What is the correlation between the old and the new - how can i judge sharpness of my old slides and prints against my computer screen?
Hope this is not a dumb question.
