1. jpgreenwood

    jpgreenwood

    Messages:
    855
    Name:
    jason
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Im hoping to treat myself to a new/used lens this Christmas and totally lost with the sheer amount of options.
    I need something in the range between 18 and 300, so any variations of 18-200, 18-270, 18-105, 50-200, 70-300 whatever.
    My daily lens is a Sigma 17-70 F2.8-4 on crop sensor so im not looking to replace this. My next option is my 300mm F4 prime which is too big to travel with.
    Im looking for a nice walkabout lens that will bridge the gap between.
    Ideally F2.8 but I know they are pricey.
    I have up to £300 to spend.
    Can anyone recommend a lens that they have experience of using, or from what they have read off review sites.

    My gut tells me to go for a big old used Nikon 80-200 F2.8 but they are selling for big prices.
    Nikon 70-210 F4-5.6 looks a good option and cheap, and will autofocus on my D7200 I believe but might be too slow.

    Other offerings from Sigma, Tamron have reasonable lenses but im just not sure if they will be quick enough for what I want. I will probably mainly use it for city breaks and a bit of landscape, but also some aviation and basic low level motorsport.
    Thanks for any help.
     
  2. SFTPhotography

    SFTPhotography Top Cat

    Messages:
    16,484
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I've had the 70-210 - I still have it but mines the constant F4. AF is slow and noisy and centre to edge sharpness isn't up there with newer lenses but it's light and cheap and using on a crop camera will be fine as the softer sides will be cropped out as it's designed for 35mm film (full frame sensor size) so a probably good bet. Center sharpness is top drawer as is colour/contrast rendition
     
  3. jpgreenwood

    jpgreenwood

    Messages:
    855
    Name:
    jason
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Thanks Steve. I really admire your photography so I will certainly value your opinion.
     
    SFTPhotography likes this.
  4. Daniel_Paul

    Daniel_Paul

    Messages:
    427
    Name:
    Daniel
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I've got the Tamron 18-200 3.5/6.3 on my D3300, it's used mainly as my walkaround lens to be honest but I can't fault it, great build quality.
     
  5. jpgreenwood

    jpgreenwood

    Messages:
    855
    Name:
    jason
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Do you have any example shots or a link to flickr etc?
     
  6. kendo1

    kendo1

    Messages:
    6,769
    Name:
    Ken
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I have the 80-200 2.8, it's a bit of a beast to carry around on holiday :)

    The 55-200 4-5.6 VRII is a pretty good lens for crop, though I've not used since I acquired the 80-200. I mainly use a D600 nowadays.
     
  7. Daniel_Paul

    Daniel_Paul

    Messages:
    427
    Name:
    Daniel
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2018
  8. gad-westy

    gad-westy

    Messages:
    5,982
    Name:
    Graham
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Jason, If you ever get up towards Newcastle, you are welcome to have a play with my 70-200 2.8 and 70-210 4-5.6 AFD. Might help the decision process.
     
  9. jpgreenwood

    jpgreenwood

    Messages:
    855
    Name:
    jason
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Many thanks to all that have posted. Got some decision making to do.
    Thanks Graham, Im only down in Boro so might take you up on that offer.
     
  10. gad-westy

    gad-westy

    Messages:
    5,982
    Name:
    Graham
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Cool. Just send me a pm if you want to call in.
     
  11. jpgreenwood

    jpgreenwood

    Messages:
    855
    Name:
    jason
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Whats your opinion of the 70-210 Graham? I think it will autofocus on my D7200 which is a bonus.
     
  12. technics100

    technics100

    Messages:
    2,436
    Name:
    Adam
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I would agree regarding the 70-210mm f/4, cracking lens and I think I have had 3 of them in the past. Loved them on my D700.. It will autofocus on the D7200 no problem. Mine were actually fine wide open and gave a decent amount of separation at f/4.

    Sent from my FIG-LX1 using Talk Photography Forums mobile app
     
  13. Kei

    Kei

    Messages:
    282
    Name:
    Kyle
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    The original 80-200mm f2.8 AF and AF-D can be had for around your budget and are very good even wide open even on my D810. AF is not as quick as the modern AF-S equivalents or the later twin ring models but I've had no issues using it for moving subjects. It's actually my most frequently used lens.

    It is fairly big and weighty, but is actually a fair bit lighter than the newer 70-200 f2.8's.
     
  14. gad-westy

    gad-westy

    Messages:
    5,982
    Name:
    Graham
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Sorry, I didn't spot this earlier. Just to be clear, my 70-210 is the variable aperture D version like this one.

    https://kenrockwell.com/nikon/7021056.htm

    I only mention it because I think a few people on the thread are also referring to the constant f/4 version which I have no experience of.

    I really like my 70-210. I really only bought if as the 70-200 can be a bit of a pain to carry around so it's nice to have a lighter option. At some point I might well swap them both for a 70-200 f/4 but for now I'm quite enjoying have the 70-210 option. I'm not too nerdy these days when it comes to assessing just how good a lens is but it all looks pretty good to me. It's built really well but isn't too heavy. I don't love the push-pull zoom but it's really just that I'm not used to it. Focus is quite fast. Certainly fast enough if not up to 70-200 levels. But you do forget that the old screw drive lenses do make a bit of noise when focusing. Overall I'm pretty happy with it and these days they cost about £100 which is hard to argue with. As I say, drop me a line if you want to try either of them out.
     
  15. jpgreenwood

    jpgreenwood

    Messages:
    855
    Name:
    jason
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I was choosing between the 70-210 D lens F4-5.6 and 70-210 fixed F4?
    However, just found a 80-200 F2.8 FOR £140. It has a temperamental Autofocus switch but that doesn't bother me. So ive bought it. Fingers crossed its not "too good to be true".
     
    Last edited: Dec 5, 2018
  16. gad-westy

    gad-westy

    Messages:
    5,982
    Name:
    Graham
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Cool. Which version is it? Not that there are any bad ones, just curiosity! Think the there was a push/pull version, followed by a rotating zoom D version and then an AF-S version. Would be great to hear how you get on.
     
  17. jpgreenwood

    jpgreenwood

    Messages:
    855
    Name:
    jason
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Its AF-S version.
     
  18. gad-westy

    gad-westy

    Messages:
    5,982
    Name:
    Graham
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Bargain! You can just use af switch on the camera anyway presumably.
     
  19. toohuge

    toohuge

    Messages:
    211
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I almost bought that one on Facebook !!

    Let us know how it is.

    If it needs a service - I’d recommend Alan Marlow - cam-rep.co.uk
     
    Last edited: Dec 6, 2018
  20. jpgreenwood

    jpgreenwood

    Messages:
    855
    Name:
    jason
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Thanks. The guy was super helpful negotiating postage in with the deal. He took photos of it packaged up and posted this morning.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice