RM, RF. It's a minefield really.

D

Doog

Messages
1,812
Name
Dougie
Edit My Images
Yes
As per the title. It's quite difficult to decide whether an image needs property or model releases and as such becomes difficult to produce RF images. I nearly always play safe and attribute them to RM. Am I doing the right thing.:shrug:

Take, for instance, an image of a flower. No model, so alright there. Not exactly property as in a structure, but some breeder might have the "copyright" for producing these. Or am I way off the mark.:shrug:
 
Theres quite a few posts about this, but in the UK its not needed at all for any subject. If you want to put it on paper then thats up to you, but again, not needed.

If you want to sell your photos to a stock agency or in the USA then I recommend getting one signed. Theres some info HERE about it (This is American law, not UK)
 
Last edited:
I wish I knew what RM and RF meant :thinking: ..... Copyright of flowers? :shrug:
 
Chris Primadona said:
Theres quite a few posts about this, but in the UK its not needed at all for any subject. If you want to put it on paper then thats up to you, but again, not needed.

If you want to sell your photos to a stock agency or in the USA then I recommend getting one signed. Theres some info HERE about it (This is American law, not UK)
Click to expand...

Alamy, I believe is an American organisation though and how is one to know where a picture is going to be sold. I'll go have a read at your link. :thumbs:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top