Scotney Castle Kent

Messages
8,004
Name
Bazza
Edit My Images
Yes
jOQaTCg.jpg


one of my favourite places and such a lot of photographic views to grab. View from behind
 


Sure looks like a great spot indeed!

I just had a look at you image in my converter to analyze it. My
first check was what body it was captured, either the D800 or
the D300 — of which I know nothing about. I assume the D800.

That very body is giving a great DR and it seems like you didn't
take full advantage of it! My converter reads 009/255 in the low
lights and 252/255 in the high lights. If your image renders these
numbers, something must have been neglected in the reading
of the data since your camera is very capable of recording all
from the dynamic range of this capture.
 
Lovely image Bazza, reflections make such a difference to a picture (y)

P.S I don't care what the analyser says...
 
Standard Information



Kodiak here you are on cotney castle photo

Make: Panasonic
Model: HC-X900M ( my camcorder)

Software: Ver.1.00
ImageSize: 5120x2880
ComponentsConfiguration: Y, Cb, Cr, -
CreateDate: 2015:09:26 10:56:49
ModifyDate: 2015:09:26 10:56:49
DateTimeOriginal: 2015:09:26 10:56:49
ExposureTime: 1/750"
Aperture: F2.4
MaxAperture: F1.5
CircleOfConfusion: 0.003 mm
HyperfocalDistance: 1.18 m
ExposureProgram: Program AE
ExposureBiasValue: 0
CompressedBitsPerPixel: 4.3
MeteringMode: Center-weighted average
Flash: Off, Did not fire
WhiteBalance: Auto
FocalLength: 2.8 mm
FocalLength35efl: 2.8 mm (35 mm equivalent: 30.0 mm)
SensingMethod: Three-chip color area
SceneType: Directly photographed
ColorSpace: sRGB
Contrast: Normal
Saturation: Normal
Sharpness: Normal

GPS Information

Other Information
BitsPerSample: 8
ColorComponents: 3
Compression: JPEG (old-style)
CustomRendered: Normal
DigitalZoomRatio: 1
Directory: C:\Users\realspeed\Desktop
EncodingProcess: Baseline DCT, Huffman coding
ExifByteOrder: Little-endian (Intel, II)
ExifImageHeight: 2880
ExifImageWidth: 5120
ExifVersion: 0220
ExposureMode: Auto
FNumber: 2.4
FOV: 61.9 deg
FileModifyDate: 2015:09:26 10:56:52+01:00
FileName: M2240007.JPG
FileSize: 6.7 MB
FileSource: Digital Camera
FileType: JPEG
FirmwareVersion: 0.1.0.0
FlashpixVersion: 0100
FocalLengthIn35mmFormat: 30 mm
GainControl: None
ImageHeight: 2880
ImageWidth: 5120
InteropIndex: R98 - DCF basic file (sRGB)
InteropVersion: 0100
LightSource: Unknown
MaxApertureValue: 1.5
Orientation: Horizontal (normal)
PanasonicExifVersion: 0300
ResolutionUnit: inches
ScaleFactor35efl: 10.6
SceneCaptureType: Standard
ShutterSpeed: 1/750
ThumbnailLength: 26765
ThumbnailOffset: 988
XResolution: 72
YCbCrPositioning: Co-sited
YCbCrSubSampling: YCbCr4:2:2 (2 1)
YResolution: 72
 
Last edited:


Thanks for the data Barry! :)

Model: NIKON D800, ExposureTime: 1/200s, Aperture: F5.6, MeteringMode: Spot, ISO: 100, LensSpec: 50mm f/1.4 G

So, the combination of both, your data and my analysis
confirms my suspicions.

MeteringMode should be Matrix so to give you a better
chance to grab a proper DR.

Even in the posted jpg, I can see details in the darkest
areas and this means the data was recorded — the D800
is crazy for that — but the data was not properly extracted
nor the setup at capture.

Your image has far better quality than what was posted!
 
Not bad though for a camcorder to get a picture that good. The data you quoted was my error sorry this is the correct data for that photo.
I have taken that shot many times and Ioposted the camcorder one. Terribly sorry to mislead you

uYmIQep.jpg


As I posted correct data above
 
Last edited:
Back
Top