My current lens collection consists of an 18-55mm, an 18-105mm, a 50mm and a 70-300mm.
Now obviously there is some cross over there, but I have got quite a good range of focal length. My question is, is the 18-55 redundant or does it have any benefit over the 18-105? It is not significantly smaller or lighter and it covers the same range and has the same aperture values. I've only ever really used it when using a polarising filter or for macro as all my attachments are 52mm rather than the 67 of the 18-105.
The other consideration is that as a kit lens, the 18-55 doesn't have great appeal, and there fore has little second hand value anyway?
Now obviously there is some cross over there, but I have got quite a good range of focal length. My question is, is the 18-55 redundant or does it have any benefit over the 18-105? It is not significantly smaller or lighter and it covers the same range and has the same aperture values. I've only ever really used it when using a polarising filter or for macro as all my attachments are 52mm rather than the 67 of the 18-105.
The other consideration is that as a kit lens, the 18-55 doesn't have great appeal, and there fore has little second hand value anyway?