- Messages
- 895
- Name
- Ben
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Hey guys,
Ive had the canon 70-300 IS USM for a while now and think its a pretty good lens i am now thinking of buying my first L series lens though.
Im trying to decide between the Canon EF 70-300mm f4-5.6L IS USM and the Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5/5.6L USM IS.
Ive read that the 400 is nearing replacement now and that the 300 is a pretty new lens and much sharper through the range?
Im also guessing the 300 should be a little better in lower light also?
The main reason ive considered the 400 is that i tend to shoot more motorsport than anything and would find the extra 100mm very useful, would a tc be the best solution to this and does the 300 stay sharper with a tc as opposed to the 400 with a tc also?
Just after some opinions on these lenses really and a bit of advice in which way to go?
Thanks in advance guys.
Ive had the canon 70-300 IS USM for a while now and think its a pretty good lens i am now thinking of buying my first L series lens though.
Im trying to decide between the Canon EF 70-300mm f4-5.6L IS USM and the Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5/5.6L USM IS.
Ive read that the 400 is nearing replacement now and that the 300 is a pretty new lens and much sharper through the range?
Im also guessing the 300 should be a little better in lower light also?
The main reason ive considered the 400 is that i tend to shoot more motorsport than anything and would find the extra 100mm very useful, would a tc be the best solution to this and does the 300 stay sharper with a tc as opposed to the 400 with a tc also?
Just after some opinions on these lenses really and a bit of advice in which way to go?
Thanks in advance guys.
Last edited: