Show us yer film shots then!

From a recent urbex

Camera:Olympus xa2 Film:Kodak tri-x 400

1.
3899941251_51d958dab4.jpg


2.
3900721512_85e5342663.jpg


3.
3900720986_3d875a4e05.jpg


4.
3899939857_3704b78c06.jpg


5.
3899938813_120a9b07b5.jpg


http://www.flickr.com/photos/umphotography/ more here

(y)
 
ab$olut they are awesome espec. number 3 I am surprised more "urbex photographers" use film as it always looks so much better imho.
 
Ok here's three wedding shots from me

3902040038_3460d9fea4.jpg


Hasselblad 80mmf2.8 Planar Fuji 400 120 can't remember the exact film it was 1995

Karolla&Burschi Radolfzell Germany (excuse the flatbed scan)

3902045244_b8ff128335.jpg


One from a wedding i did at the Royal Holloway college about four years ago

Hasselblad 80mmf2.8 planar fuji NPH400

3901266711_a0c612c8d8.jpg


Nigel & Penny Ramada Hotel East Horsley

again on my old Blad Fuji 400 NPH 120
 
3900717066_e503f4a417.jpg


3899935301_da6e72b6ed.jpg


3899934797_942c2d07d1.jpg


:)
 
ab$olut, I like that one of the old Triumph - something about smooth or flat surfaces and B&W chemistry. Well taken, and it reminds me of some shots I took of a 1960's Ford Mustang on Delta 400 with my Bronnie:

3914309583_43099e21fd_o.jpg


3914309435_7afdafa074_o.jpg


3915094168_c963f048a7_o.jpg
 
I totally agree

Love that 2nd shot! :cool:

I should shoot more B&W to be honest its much easier the scan for a start! :D
 
3900745819_13a80b8739.jpg


3900716646_6ff8d7459c.jpg


3899549263_d3b3ebf2b9.jpg
 
Some excelnet images there the car ones are good also like the mine workings in ab$olut shot.

Interesting shot there cowaski. looks liek it needs a little boost with levels if you scanning into Photoshop.

On the other side is that scratchs I see on the neg?
 
ekimeno said:
vmlopes - I absolutely LOVE that first one ;)
Click to expand...

Thanks ekimeno, bit of a chance shot those two beach ones as I was working at Sandown on the IOW and had a walk down on the beach early in the morning........not sure I like the colour cast in that film though, something bout the chemistry I guess.

Think I'll stick to Acros or Neopan normal B&W though
 
daveharlow, sweet!

glad to see i'm not the only one using a trip, love the wee thing. lol.

i find my colours are very similar to yours, thought it was my scanning or expired film but maybe the 'look' they have is what the trip does?
 
onefunkypenguin said:
daveharlow, sweet!

glad to see i'm not the only one using a trip, love the wee thing. lol.

i find my colours are very similar to yours, thought it was my scanning or expired film but maybe the 'look' they have is what the trip does?
Click to expand...

Cheers, From what I can remember they are taken on expired film, i really must stick some in date through to see the difference.
I'm finally getting more pictures back in focus. Finally!
Have a roll of Ilford HP5 that's almost finished, am looking forward to seeing the results.
 
vmlopes said:
Thanks ekimeno, bit of a chance shot those two beach ones as I was working at Sandown on the IOW and had a walk down on the beach early in the morning........not sure I like the colour cast in that film though, something bout the chemistry I guess.

Think I'll stick to Acros or Neopan normal B&W though
Click to expand...

I've found that when scanning C41 B&W films I avoid the colour cast by setting the film type to Colour Neg and the image type to Greyscale (if I leave it at the default 24-bit colour I get exactly the same cast-it's the same as when getting prints on colour paper rather than proper B&W paper).

This is on Kodak BW400CN (another C41 B&W film):

3921769843_a06e3542ae_o.jpg
 
Maybe, I dunno, the whole roll is baad.
I need 1/1000th mostly to shoot wide open with 100 film.
I also think my rodinal is off, the grain for fp4 is horrific.
To be honest, I'm not sure what's wrong, I'm just gutted that 36 frames took me half a lifetime to shoot and gave not one single half decent frame...:crying:
 
excalibur2, I like your results using reala. Do you overexpose slightly to get the colours shown there? I can't get it to work for me.

1 from tonight, I think something *may* have gone wrong in developing, pretty gutted actually.

3924453476_25c04556b9.jpg

8mins at f/16.

Sam.
 
Sam_G said:
excalibur2, I like your results using reala. Do you overexpose slightly to get the colours shown there? I can't get it to work for me.

1 from tonight, I think something *may* have gone wrong in developing, pretty gutted actually.

3924453476_25c04556b9.jpg

8mins at f/16.

Sam.
Click to expand...

OMG? I always give about 1/2 stop extra for colour neg film and I can't be bothered to do my own colour developing anymore for 35mm when Tescos will do it while you shop, sometimes in 30 mins for 99p....mind you it's pot luck with what staff is on duty for results, as you could end up with the healing brush in Photoshop.
 
Two from a roll of out of date Fuji Provia 100, both stitched from two images no processing other than crop and layers.

img0018cm.jpg


Croyde, UK

img027cm-2.jpg


Southern Spain.
 
Had a chance return to a derelict lunatic asylum yesterday, mainly to try some new pocketwizard radio triggers for my dslr but took the leica along..

Leica M4, Summicron 50mm DR on Fuji Superia 200

3925049617_b1fbf050e7.jpg


3925048439_058d24c55f.jpg


3925832438_a875d5a0a7.jpg


3925046167_518f468600.jpg
 
Last edited:
Sam_G said:
excalibur2, I like your results using reala. Do you overexpose slightly to get the colours shown there? I can't get it to work for me.

1 from tonight, I think something *may* have gone wrong in developing, pretty gutted actually.

3924453476_25c04556b9.jpg

8mins at f/16.

Sam.
Click to expand...

Double exposure or fogging ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top