Asha
Blithering Idiot
- Messages
- 11,274
- Name
- Asha
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Opinions please!
Edit to add; I presume the change from "poo" to "pooh" is simply an excremental one
Thanks Brian.Excellent shot Nick, it makes my similar shot look crap in comparison.
Some of the scenery where you live would be great in colour...but thinking IMO it's best with at least a MF camera and would be too much lugging it up hills... a MF and LF camera as well as digi camera.
A ETRS is quite small and takes good shots like this, OOD Fuji 400Hpro
Well I see loads of sheep and cows but thought they weren't worth shooting as a group, but somehow you have made it interesting...is it the two in front looking at you or cos it's B\W???
Ilford Pan-F Plus
Love the low angle on this Nige.
I find this does make a difference in perspective when viewing a scene. Placing a camera at the equivalent of chest level when standing often brings a different (and more pleasing) view of the world than when taking the same shot at eye level, particularly if you are on the tall side.Thanks Ian. Waist-level finders for the win!
I find this does make a difference in perspective when viewing a scene. Placing a camera at the equivalent of chest level when standing often brings a different (and more pleasing) view of the world than when taking the same shot at eye level, particularly if you are on the tall side.
#1 for me, really good photo IMHOOpinions please!
This entrance is one of the oldest in the village, the doorway itself dating back to 17th century. ( shame about the modern handle but there you go)
I have actually exposed it several times from slightly different perspectives and focusing but as yet not found one that I am truly happy with. ( Iirc I posted one in here some time ago)
The problem lies with the verticals/horizontals as they are all over the place which even with all the movements of a view camera are proving impossible to redress.
Much as it is as it is, given its age, as a photograph, I'm finding it difficult to accept when viewing it.
However, this attempt has got the lines considerably better than previous attempts ( believe it or not!)
Out of these two, which do you feel works better ? ( ignore any dust etc)
Maybe I should just abandon the idea altogether??
No 1
View attachment 282616
No 2
View attachment 282615
Bronica SQA, Portra 160, shot whilst shooting some digital images for my daughter's etsy shop (hope no one minds me giving it a plug for face masks, bags and other prints search icseandseashop at Etsy)
by Chris H, on Flickr
#1 for me, really good photo IMHO
I'd lose the bright reflection but I like the focus on the rear wall and the hand rail leading who-knows-where, good tonal range and details through the windowFlip, I wasn't expecting a response like that from anyone
Now I dunno wether to say thanks or to hate ya cos your comment has given me a sudden feeling that it's worthwhile printing, a decission that I had pretty much decided against.
Now I'm indecisive again…..arghh!
prints search icseandseashop at Etsy
Thanks for proof reading I've corrected it.which differs from the name in the photo....
GroanAnd as for "Que?" I assume the SQA is a Manuel camera.
Not sure it's right yet, Chris? Iceandseashop....Thanks for proof reading I've corrected it.
Groan
Thanks, third time luckyNot sure it's right yet, Chris? Iceandseashop....
This is exceptionally well done! I often find graveyard compositions call to me, but I usually find I can't pull them off. I'm assuming this is a longer lens, and it has worked very well indeed. The only jarring note is the inwards lean on the building top right, but I guess that's unavoidable...Yashica Mat 124G
Ilford Pan-F Plus
Ilfotec DD-X 1+4 8mins @ 20°
Crucifix by fishyfish_arcade, on Flickr
This is exceptionally well done! I often find graveyard compositions call to me, but I usually find I can't pull them off. I'm assuming this is a longer lens, and it has worked very well indeed. The only jarring note is the inwards lean on the building top right, but I guess that's unavoidable...
Interesting that in 'Sunday Morning' the dark areas are a bit underexposed, whilst in 'He can't get me' the exposure is perfect. The light conditions look very similar.
What do you use to scan, as a matter of interest, Nige. I've just got myself a MF camera, but I've only got 35mm scanners.