Review Sigma 120 - 400mm DG OS

[bookwyse]

My first review and also my first 'decent' lens.

Sirst impression was 'how big' it is certainly a big lens but feels very well put together.

I will let the pictiures do the rest though.

All of thess were taken on a 400d and I welcome C&C.

http://i232.photobucket.com/albums/ee271/bookwyse1/new lens/IMG_3727.jpg

http://i232.photobucket.com/albums/ee271/bookwyse1/new lens/IMG_3720.jpg

http://i232.photobucket.com/albums/ee271/bookwyse1/new lens/IMG_3908.jpg

http://i232.photobucket.com/albums/ee271/bookwyse1/new lens/IMG_3901.jpg

http://i232.photobucket.com/albums/ee271/bookwyse1/new lens/IMG_4287.jpg

http://i232.photobucket.com/albums/ee271/bookwyse1/new lens/IMG_4328.jpg

http://i232.photobucket.com/albums/ee271/bookwyse1/new lens/IMG_4675.jpg

http://i232.photobucket.com/albums/ee271/bookwyse1/new lens/IMG_4632.jpg

http://i232.photobucket.com/albums/ee271/bookwyse1/new lens/IMG_4527.jpg

http://i232.photobucket.com/albums/ee271/bookwyse1/new lens/IMG_4309.jpg

 

[Steep]

A proper 'text' review would be more helpful, along with pictures with exif info for each.

I think you need to make those images just links before a mod does it, they are all well over the posting size limits

p.s. like the tiger and giraffe shots very much

 

[IanC_UK]

Have changed to links as these images are over the forum guidelines of 800 pixels along the longest side, if you change the pics you can re instate the links

Were these pictures handheld ? or tripod mounted ? The tiger shot in particular looks a bit soft ?

 

[bookwyse]

WIll do a proper review later on with all of the exif data.

All of the shots except the robin were handheld either through mesh or glass. They have not been processed in any way yet.

 

[Steep]

That might have affected them, especially if the glass wasn't too clean.