Sigma 70-300mm

Messages
738
Name
Nick
Edit My Images
Yes
What are you thoughts on the

Sigma 70-300mm F4-5.6 APO DG Macro EOS

Thanks

Nick
 
It's a nice lens for the price. I haven't used mine as much I should really.
It's a solid feel to it and pretty weighty compared with the kit lens, Tamron 50-200mm and 50mm.

Focussing can be slow sometimes and in darker periods it can take a few seconds to lock on focus.

Some of my shots have come out blurry on the longer end due to no IS.

Here are some test pics taken with the Sigma (under good lighting conditions).

Top of Selfridges building (from other side of road I think)

img2106mo.jpg


Selfridges - Stood opposite side of road

img2109.jpg


Page from supermarket magazine (Macro shot I think)

img1890y.jpg



Taken from other side of road

img2114s.jpg



Hope these help.


PS Great bike shots Buggerlugs
 
Last edited:
Ahhh! Thanks for the info people. From the pictures i can see. This lens looks pretty damn good for £200. I guess its so cheap cause it doesnt have IS i guess. But then again maybe a monopod could sort that out i dont know.

Im new to photography and only have small zoom lenses so i need something a little longer for when i need it if you get where im coming from.

Thanks

Nick
 
I got mine 2nd hand (from the classified section here) for £65 iirc.
Very good lens for the money.

PS I'm new to DSLR photography too and still learning :)
 
I got mine 2nd hand (from the classified section here) for £65 iirc.
Very good lens for the money.

PS I'm new to DSLR photography too and still learning :)

I bought mine for £90 and sold it for £120 a year later :) Mint ones can be found for betwen £65 (see above) and about £130, for the money you can't go wrong. AF is the standard DC motor type so can be a bit slow in darker situations, but in good light whilst it's not USM or HSM fast it's pretty good.
 
I've heard the 55-250mm
Canon is better than the sigma? Would you go for the Canon instead?

Thanks

Nick
 
Back
Top