- Messages
- 104,465
- Name
- The other Chris
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Sorry Nige, I missed your reply from back in May (was it really May when I last looked at this thread) but I guess you know the answer.Did you manage to get any you're happy with for FPOTY?
Sorry Nige, I missed your reply from back in May (was it really May when I last looked at this thread) but I guess you know the answer.Did you manage to get any you're happy with for FPOTY?
The shutter seems a bit hit and miss but it must be 70 years old and I haven't used the camera for probably 30 years so I guess that is to be expected. The lens seems sharp enough despite a lot of small scratches on the front element. Here's a zoom-in on frame 4, you can just make out a dog and a gull amongst the grainWhat's the verdict on the camera?
TBH I struggle to compose and focus with the Bronica WLF, most of the above had to be straightened but I tend to compose a bit wide and crop, doesn't degrade too much on 6x6. That said I do like looking at the world though a WLF, I find it easier to "see" what the final result will be than having the camera up to my eye so pros and cons.Can barely see through the Automat's WLF
Yes, that's the one, hence the behind-bars shot.Is that the circus that's been stranded in Morecambe since lockdown began?
I don't know what happened to #1 same time of day as the rest, under trees so a bit darker but no too dark and there is a weird mark bottom centre, perhaps there was a ghost#12 is my favourite. #1 reminds me of one of those shots purported to show a ghost.
Thanks Ian, I'm sure there is room for more than one Telephone Exchange project ;-) they did have a penchant for the brutalist it seems. I suppose I was going for an empty space in front of the abandoned caravan to sort of indicate that the car had driven off.Some lovely frames here Chris. I really like #12 too but I think the composition needs working a bit harder. Too much empty space for me. But then I have problems seeing in square so that's worth nothing....
Frame 3 really appeals to my sense of humour too. As does frame 6. As a new starter to BT in 1988, I was told that if I needed to find the telephone exhange in any strange town. "Look for the ugliest building". I'd do a project on it if it hadn't been done by someone far better than me already.
I suppose I was going for an empty space in front of the abandoned caravan to sort of indicate that the car had driven off.
It feels a bit weird to be having this online conversation in sort-of real time. But not at all, it's always good to know whether my ideas succeed and in this case, and may be with an image at the size, it seems not.Goes to show I know nowt,
It feels a bit weird to be having this online conversation in sort-of real time.
Well spotted, it was flash. I really like the spooky set idea, unintended consequences of a holga on a grey day.almost flash
As a new starter to BT in 1988, I was told that if I needed to find the telephone exhange in any strange town. "Look for the ugliest building".
I shot it at 400, given the current weather the light has been hit and miss at best and I just wanted to get a feel for it.So glad it's getting shot Chris. It would have stayed in my freezer forever. I actually quite liked the 35mm scans and am still waiting on 1 roll of 120 that I put through the RB. In my original ad I was going to flog off the 35mm with the 120 then had a change of heart. 2 rolls left.
I think it suits architecture & street photography very well. What did you shoot it at? I split the difference at 200...
I agree, the landscapes where just to see what happens when shot towards the light although there is something about #10 that I like when viewed larger and the contrast is excellent IMHO. Petty we've now got to stay at home really.I like the look of those Chris. The muted tones look good. I agree with Ian that it works better for the street compositions than the landscapes. Frame #1 is the one I like best.
Petty we've now got to stay at home really.