Finally caught up with all espidoes, rather enjoying so far. Am I the only one who looked up the kit they where using? Leica SL + zoom + £8.5k.
Finally caught up with all espidoes, rather enjoying so far. Am I the only one who looked up the kit they where using? Leica SL + zoom + £8.5k.
Not just you!!! Seen a Leica M used a number of times too.
They're using film in the final, I see...
They used them alot for the street stuff, Leica must be loving the publicity.
I've been watching the series after recording it. What struck me is their 'mentor' tell them what he thinks is good, or works, and then they show something completely different as their 'final' choice and get slated. What's the point of a mentor if you are going to ignore what they say??
What good is a mentor after the fact?
Agreed, a couple have given very good feedback, which has also been ignored and people have gone home as a result.Massively helpful in terms of vision, selection, cropping etc.
Really enjoyed the final, disagreed with the final decision though.
I thought Marta until they announced that the final judgement would be made on all the challenges when I changed my mind to Rupert. I thought Gabriel was weakest across the series, just shows what I knowIt was quite good, I was thinking Marta was going to take the win,
I see the 'Master of Photography' website is now accepting e-mail address submissions of potential entrants for the next series. Anybody fancy their chances?
You say it like it's a bad thing? She still had the nerve to go up to people in the street to ask to take photos, which is more than I can do, and in my opinion was better than the paparazzi style approach Gabriel used at times.I'm glad Marta didn't win. She was weak, quiet, awkwardly shy, missed the point, failed more than anyone else and held on through blind luck throughout the series except for the odd mediocre performance and that was very apparent from criticism from the judges throughout the series. Of all the contestants she was the one who was robbed the least. More lives than a cat, a huge lack of EQ that often left a feeling of awkwardness during the show that was painful to watch.
It was always going to be Gabriel or Rupert, but I was surprised at the conclusion and the way the program pushed the idea of Marta to cast a mist of doubt was in poor taste and more of what I would expect from a production containing Simon Cowell.
The series concept was great. The unconstructive criticism from the judges and incredibly poor explanation of brief let the program down ultimately but the novelty of a photography program I'll admit was enough to hold my interest and have me return each week to watch.
My daughter kept saying to me daddy please do it, you can do it....
I'm glad Marta didn't win. She was weak, quiet, awkwardly shy
missed the point...
Why is being quiet a bad thing?
I don't think she was shy. In Athens, she captured potentially touchy financiers and got into a refugee camp (unlike Rupert).
She got better as the series went on. Based on feedback in the show, I'd say she won the last two rounds.
She may have got better as the series went on but in most early episodes she should have gone home.
I'd agree it was if the contestants all remained and were awarded points. As it was an elimination series she shouldn't had been offered the chance to improve week in week out. Bottom two or three every single week pretty much until the last two where blind luck saw her perform and even that that was subjective.Yeah, she wasn't great early on. But improving throughout the series is what it's all about, right?
I'd agree it was if the contestants all remained and were awarded points. As it was an elimination series she shouldn't had been offered the chance to improve week in week out. Bottom two or three every single week pretty much until the last two where blind luck saw her perform and even that that was subjective.
Tell you what, next series, why don't we vote for a TP winner in each round.
Tell you what, next series, why don't we vote for a TP winner in each round.
We could run a "Master of Talk Photography" tie-in. Copy the brief (as it is) from each week's show and then have until the next week to take shots. Might be difficult if the brief is "Capture the essence of Berlin nightlife" or something though.
We could run a "Master of Talk Photography" tie-in. Copy the brief (as it is) from each week's show and then have until the next week to take shots. Might be difficult if the brief is "Capture the essence of Berlin nightlife" or something though.
We could run a "Master of Talk Photography" tie-in. Copy the brief (as it is) from each week's show and then have until the next week to take shots. Might be difficult if the brief is "Capture the essence of Berlin nightlife" or something though.
I'd agree it was if the contestants all remained and were awarded points. As it was an elimination series she shouldn't had been offered the chance to improve week in week out. Bottom two or three every single week pretty much until the last two where blind luck saw her perform and even that that was subjective.
(Rupert's Buck Palace shot was awful, btw - just a snapshot)
For me Gabriel's were:-. Gabrielles image of the celebrity was very poor,
For comparison, RupertFor me Gabriel's were:-
Week 1 Rome: Strong
Week 2 Berlin: Very weak
Week 3 The Body: So so
Week 4 Celebrity Portrait : Very weak
Week 5 London Backstage: Very weak
Week 6 Irish Landscape: So so
Week 7 Home Sweet Home: So so
Week 8 Europeans, Places and Faces: Reasonably strong
So out of 8 weeks and had two strong weeks, a few so so and a few weak, doesn't make a winner imo. Almost makes me think they chose him to be deliberately controversial.