Having been a teacher I can confirm that those things written above aren't an issue. You don't recover the old ground you expect the student to catch up in their own time. It rarely ever affects anyone else in the classroom.
Have taken son out of school already and will be doing do again in sept. no harm done and as its a farm holiday will learn a lot too. Planning a Disney trip in a couple of years and will do the same then if its cheaper.
The real point is this:
Do what's in your family and child's best interest. If that means not going in school time then do that.
If not then take them out.
But don't let the government tell you what's best for your own family and child
Very educational
Having been a teacher
How do you figure that?
Prices change based on supply and demand. If there was less demand in July be use peopl were going in April or may or even feb then prices woud drop.
Seems pretty obvious to me. That's usually how economics work.
Also if people went on holiday through all term times as well as holidays there would be less people on holiday
I think you are wrong. Supply and demand. I doubt we'll agree though so no point regurgitating the point.
The real point is this:
Do what's in your family and child's best interest....
But don't let the government tell you what's best for your own family and child
Having just spoken to my better half, who *is* a teacher, I can confirm they are an issue in the current classroom environment. If I may ask, when were you last active in the classroom as society's relationship with schools is changing rapidly, and you can no longer count on the support of parents in encouraging their children to 'catch up in their own time' - some consider it a petty rule and therefore not worth supporting.
What did you teach Joe? Hope it wasn't English!
Not sure where you get that from Joe, prices for most like for like holidays in this country are relatively high no matter what the month is.
Fewer people on holiday.
Are you sure you used to be a teacher?!
Steve.
well I know we won't agree - but given that I actually run holiday accomodation as part of my job, and you basically don't , I am actually qualified to say that you are wrong on this point
repeating supply and demand over and over again won't make you any righter.
Absolutely, teach your child to break the law if they don't agree with it, thats in their best inter... oh wait a minuite
I was last full time about 6 years ago but I still am involved with my local school at the moment voluntarily in the classroom while I have some spare time at the moment. I'm also regularly in touch with teachers as part of my job and the majority of my friends are teachers and also concur that it's only an issue when it comes to year 10 and 11 or during coursework and exams, generally it's no big deal
We all break laws or rules to some extent. We have all (probably) broken the speed limit willingly, stolen something (copying music for example), parked illegally... There is a time to stand your ground and to do what you believe is right, a number of rules are an ass!
We all break laws or rules to some extent. We have all (probably) broken the speed limit willingly, stolen something (copying music for example), parked illegally... There is a time to stand your ground and to do what you believe is right, a number of rules are an ass!
As I said in my first post, the impact increases the further up the school you go. GCSE years are now 9, 10 & 11 in my kids school (for the youngest), it was just 10 & 11 for the other two. So I agree with you that it is a problem in the latter years, so presumably you would not advocate taking a child out in those years.
I would also readily agree that it is unlikely to be an issue in years R, 1 or 2 for example, but at what point does it become an issue? Year 6 when you end of year grades will affect how your secondary school views you? Year 7, year 8 - when many languages are running on an accelerated programme?
There comes a point where you have to set a rule for the majority. Personally, I would say no term time holidays post year 5 to keep it simple and consistent - but then families don't normally have just the one kid and this does become restrictive.
In my case ive occasionally accidentally broken the speed limit by a little bit - Ive never stolen anying (including copyright violations ), or parked illegally.
However even if I had occasionally broken the law , it would never occur to me to teach a child that it was right to do so
And yet I can show you evidence that backs up my opinion but it won't make a difference so there's really no point.
The thing is joe you can't - because your point is factually wrong.
I have evidence that refutes your first point ...
something you read on the internet isnt the same as evidence joe - if you want to take it to pm please feel free to send me whatever "evidence" you have but otherwise lets just leave it (and incidentally you are the one that won't let this go - so trying to seize the moral highground when you have a well founded reputation of being willing to argue with a mirror isnt doing anyone any favours)
As I said in my first post, the impact increases the further up the school you go. GCSE years are now 9, 10 & 11 in my kids school (for the youngest), it was just 10 & 11 for the other two. So I agree with you that it is a problem in the latter years, so presumably you would not advocate taking a child out in those years.
I would also readily agree that it is unlikely to be an issue in years R, 1 or 2 for example, but at what point does it become an issue? Year 6 when you end of year grades will affect how your secondary school views you? Year 7, year 8 - when many languages are running on an accelerated programme?
There comes a point where you have to set a rule for the majority. Personally, I would say no term time holidays post year 5 to keep it simple and consistent - but then families don't normally have just the one kid and this does become restrictive.
Some well made points in all your posts on this subject! But I suspect it's another typical thread by the OP which, on the surface appears to ask a reasonable question, but then is just a platform for him to belittle every opinion that doesn't conform to his.
We'll be getting close to the "we'll have to agree to disagree" stage soon.
We are in agreement for a large part of what you say.
...
By the way I should say I also respect your parnter has a different opinion and its valid for sure
The school will advise but it is noe a big deal.
"not" or "now"?
Now
LA can issue penalty notice £££
That said the charge will be less than savings o holiday cost and the benefit of less crowded resorts
Not all LA have implemented fines
S
Exactly the fine is £50 per child per incident which may rise to £60. A penalty well worth paying inmo for the benefit the child and family gets
what benefit is the child getting exactly?
The list goes on and on.