- Messages
- 16,055
- Edit My Images
- Yes
yeah priced as expected. will wait for a year or so to see if I can pick up one sub-2K.Was always going to be this price, the Mark I is still listed as £2500 on the Sony site. Cheaper than the RF though.
yeah priced as expected. will wait for a year or so to see if I can pick up one sub-2K.Was always going to be this price, the Mark I is still listed as £2500 on the Sony site. Cheaper than the RF though.
I wonder how long it will take the likes of Panamoz to discount it? I doubt it’ll go sub £2k uk price as the Mark I is still £2100 (although there’s £200 cash back at the mo).yeah priced as expected. will wait for a year or so to see if I can pick up one sub-2K.
The Mk 1 is £1739 at E-fin so I guess it will be a good while before the Mk 2 is sub 2000I wonder how long it will take the likes of Panamoz to discount it? I doubt it’ll go sub £2k uk price as the Mark I is still £2100 (although there’s £200 cash back at the mo).
As you know I’ve been waiting for this lens for a while but I do like the portability of the Tamron, fits in a nice small bag, so I’m not convinced I’ll get this lens after all. We’ll see, too early yet anyway.
Thanks for that Lee, I will have a play when I get in from work tonight..On the A7......
Menu > DISP button > Display/Finder & you can select what you want displayed for each.
I was thinking more along the lines of buying used than from panamozI wonder how long it will take the likes of Panamoz to discount it? I doubt it’ll go sub £2k uk price as the Mark I is still £2100 (although there’s £200 cash back at the mo).
As you know I’ve been waiting for this lens for a while but I do like the portability of the Tamron, fits in a nice small bag, so I’m not convinced I’ll get this lens after all. We’ll see, too early yet anyway.
Not Sony but I found this interesting...
How This Photographer Creates His Light Painted Halo Long Exposures
The results are spectacular and awe-inspiring.petapixel.com
Is it easy to get a drone to fly in an as far as I can see perfect circle? I dunno.
Never understood this closer look business, rarely reveals anything newFor anyone interested...
A closer look at Sony's FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II, the first 'Mark II' G Master lens
The FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II is Sony's first attempt to update its 'G Master' lineup. The inside has been completely reworked. Follow along as we hit the highlights of this latest high-end telezoom, with a full-on analysis of its optics.www.dpreview.com
They may be a bit like rocking horse poo for a good while at least on the used market. I know far less are sold but it is exceptionally rare to find 400mm and 600mm Sony primes used. The 70-200 II will be bought as it is clearly the best lens in that range for Sony cameras. Far more people upgrade than downgrade and there is nothing to upgrade to and not likely to be for a long time. I suppose some will buy the zoom and think they would be better with a 135mm but I think it will be many months before they are under £2k on the used market even if you find one. Not unusual for lenses to be cheaper to import than buy used in the UK and it is only really here than being imported reduces the value so much. On ebay etc and even selling to MPB it doesn't seem to matterI was thinking more along the lines of buying used than from panamoz
They may be a bit like rocking horse poo for a good while at least on the used market. I know far less are sold but it is exceptionally rare to find 400mm and 600mm Sony primes used. The 70-200 II will be bought as it is clearly the best lens in that range for Sony cameras. Far more people upgrade than downgrade and there is nothing to upgrade to and not likely to be for a long time. I suppose some will buy the zoom and think they would be better with a 135mm but I think it will be many months before they are under £2k on the used market even if you find one. Not unusual for lenses to be cheaper to import than buy used in the UK and it is only really here than being imported reduces the value so much. On ebay etc and even selling to MPB it doesn't seem to matter
I have no issue carrying around a 70-200 and 100-400 all day. I'd only take the 200-600 for specific shoots. With the new 70-200 only around a kilo you could carry that and a 24-70mm F4 and it would be roughly the same weight as my old Nikon 70-200.My view is that these lenses along with the 100-400 and 200-600 aren't designed to pack and walk around with, they are the lenses you put in your bag for when you have a shot/shots in mind that you know you can only get with those lenses.
Weirdly, I use my 24-105 as a benchmark, that lens only gets used on holidays or days out with my wife, and that or close to it is probably my limit when combined with my a7r2 for how much I want to carry around all day on a casual basis. If I had a certain shot I wanted, I would be happy to carry more but more short term...
My view is that these lenses along with the 100-400 and 200-600 aren't designed to pack and walk around with, they are the lenses you put in your bag for when you have a shot/shots in mind that you know you can only get with those lenses.
Weirdly, I use my 24-105 as a benchmark, that lens only gets used on holidays or days out with my wife, and that or close to it is probably my limit when combined with my a7r2 for how much I want to carry around all day on a casual basis. If I had a certain shot I wanted, I would be happy to carry more but more short term...
Hope you are right as I will be on the look out for one. They have the perfect formula now and I can see my Tamron 70-180 and Sony 100-400 being swapped out for a new 70-200. If I can get it for under 2K used then even better and I could keep the Tammy for a dog walking lens. I think The new lens with the extenders would replace the 100-400 for me and I would use the 70-200 far moreWhile I largely agree, there is a significant portion of the gear-buying group of toggers that will buy an A1, top GM lenses, then flog the lot after a few months to buy a Canon R series outfit. These are the people who naturally provide used kit that's barely seen the sunlight to guys like Anand and others.
The 24-105mm is borderline for me for a travel lens, heavier than I’d ideally like. The Olly EM1-II and 12-40mm f2.8 was great for this but I’ll have to ‘cope’ with the heavier Sony system now. I’ve actually wondered if the 16-35mm might be better for certain trips.My view is that these lenses along with the 100-400 and 200-600 aren't designed to pack and walk around with, they are the lenses you put in your bag for when you have a shot/shots in mind that you know you can only get with those lenses.
Weirdly, I use my 24-105 as a benchmark, that lens only gets used on holidays or days out with my wife, and that or close to it is probably my limit when combined with my a7r2 for how much I want to carry around all day on a casual basis. If I had a certain shot I wanted, I would be happy to carry more but more short term...
12-40mm should really be compared with something like 24-70mm f4.The 24-105mm is borderline for me for a travel lens, heavier than I’d ideally like. The Olly EM1-II and 12-40mm f2.8 was great for this but I’ll have to ‘cope’ with the heavier Sony system now. I’ve actually wondered if the 16-35mm might be better for certain trips.
Don't say that. I have my hopes on the as yet released 24-70 GM II, but if that's a no go the 24-105 is my next choice. Used to have the 24-70 f4 but it never wowed was just okay.The 24-105mm is borderline for me for a travel lens, heavier than I’d ideally like. The Olly EM1-II and 12-40mm f2.8 was great for this but I’ll have to ‘cope’ with the heavier Sony system now. I’ve actually wondered if the 16-35mm might be better for certain trips.
I thought you were selling your Sony stuff?Still waiting to see how the new Tamron 35-150mm performs.
I wasn't making a direct. comparison just more what I prefer weight wise12-40mm should really be compared with something like 24-70mm f4.
YMMV, I prefer to travel light when walking around busy cities etcDon't say that. I have my hopes on the as yet released 24-70 GM II, but if that's a no go the 24-105 is my next choice. Used to have the 24-70 f4 but it never wowed was just okay.
I'll have to compare them to the 24-70f4 I had before, that was fine. Usually in the bag along with a bottle of water and sun cream.I wasn't making a direct. comparison just more what I prefer weight wise
YMMV, I prefer to travel light when walking around busy cities etc
I have the 24-70mm f4 too, definitely lighter to carry around.I'll have to compare them to the 24-70f4 I had before, that was fine. Usually in the bag along with a bottle of water and sun cream.
I thought you were selling your Sony stuff?
Yeah it's always love/hate with Sony.I have a bit of a love/hate thing going on with th a9, hence the reason I'm not exactly pushing it in the sales section.
What's there to hate about the A9?I have a bit of a love/hate thing going on with th a9, hence the reason I'm not exactly pushing it in the sales section.
I’m pretty happy with Sony. Sure there’s some things lacking but that’s true of all cameras, it doesn’t spoil the overall experience for me.Yeah it's always love/hate with Sony.
Has been like that for a while. I really wish they'd sort out the little niggles....
What's there to hate about the A9?
Just asking so that I'll have a reason not to buy one, other than being stingy
Yep you’re always going to lose reach with FF, that being said I’ve always found I can crop more heavily with FF than I can smaller formats.For me it's all about the amount of MP ... for instance I shot this on my 7D MKII which is a 20MP crop sensor. the picture is then cropped to over 100% which left me with a 300 KB file, I would have liked to have gone in more but it just turned to mush. If I had done the same on the a9 which is half the MP in APS-C mode it just wouldn't have stood up at all. Ideally I would just get the A1 but I'm not prepared to spend 6k on a camera body.
Apart from that it's a fantastic camera and the 200-600mm is unbeatable in any other system IMO.
If I sold some of my film era 50mm primes I might be able to afford a downpayment on one.Yep you’re always going to lose reach with FF, that being said I’ve always found I can crop more heavily with FF than I can smaller formats.
In an ideal world I’d have the A1 too but like you I can’t justify or afford £6k for a camera.
To be fair to the A9 you can’t compare cropping on a 20MP APS-C camera with a 20MP full frame camera in cropped mode. the canon R6 would have the same issue as the A9 when shooting in APS-C mode and cropping in further. The ideal solution would either be an even longer lens or getting closer to your subject via field craft and hides. The latter is much harder and a lot more time consuming.For me it's all about the amount of MP ... for instance I shot this on my 7D MKII which is a 20MP crop sensor. the picture is then cropped to over 100% which left me with a 300 KB file, I would have liked to have gone in more but it just turned to mush. If I had done the same on the a9 which is half the MP in APS-C mode it just wouldn't have stood up at all. Ideally I would just get the A1 but I'm not prepared to spend 6k on a camera body.
Apart from that it's a fantastic camera and the 200-600mm is unbeatable in any other system IMO.
Wow. !! Gosh. !!