some serious distortion on the tall building to the right ,looks like its falling over![]()
Reminded me of this shot from a few days ago. Lighthouse with subsidencesome serious distortion on the tall building to the right ,looks like its falling over![]()
DSC08845.jpg by Keith, on FlickrF1.2 glass with high mega pixel bodies. Just saying
F1.2 glass with high mega pixel bodies. Just saying

As Jon's hinting with a high res body, I just carry couple lenses and use crop mode.Exactly this i shoot for fun nothing else.
The reason I sold my last 70-200 was the extra weight when out walking with the kids.
The 1.2 isn’t that heavy but for a fixed focal length lens is noticeably heavier and having two lens at that weight for fun isn’t ideal
To be fair they're not as heavy as Canon, and especially Nikon f1.2's but they're not light either. If you're doing a job then yeah you'll lug them about, but if you're just going for a day out you don't really want to be lugging all that weight around, at least I don't![]()
Just hinting towards a conversation from a page or two back.I'm not quite sure what you are saying - stop down a little and these lenses are usually the very best available.
Bro when I shot just for fun I used to head out with 2 x D700 grips and all, a 24-70 on one a 70-200 on the other and a 35,50,85 in a bag.Exactly this i shoot for fun nothing else.
The reason I sold my last 70-200 was the extra weight when out walking with the kids.
The 1.2 isn’t that heavy but for a fixed focal length lens is noticeably heavier and having two lens at that weight for fun isn’t ideal
Yeah once upon a time I'd have carried anything, but having had fibromyalgia for the past 10 years or so carrying heavy equipment is far from ideal. When I do motorsports (A1, 100-400mm, 70-200mm f2.8 and a prime) I'm in pain for 3 or 4 days afterAs you get older the weight makes a difference. When I was 27 I wandered around with a medium format outfit on one shoulder, a 35mm SLR with 28-70, 70-210 beercan and 18mm + 50mm primes on the other, plus carry a kid. Now in my mid 60s a Sony A7III and a couple of lenses are enough.

Pollen prob can be a real pain to remove.I've got a couple of 'marks' on my sensor, they look like dust but they're not budging. I've tried the in camera cleaning, rocket blower, dry swab and wet swab, I even risked going at them with the corner of the swab. Any ideas what it might be and how to shift it? I've had pollen on sensors before but it's usually shifted with a couple of goes with the wet swab![]()
What's the best way to shift it?Pollen prob can be a real pain to remove.
Wet clean and many of them is usually the only way unfortunately.What's the best way to shift it?
Looks great, no apologies necessary.More holiday snaps. Sorry
Panoramas.
View attachment 482502
View attachment 482503
View attachment 482504
Single shot.
View attachment 482505
phillipreeve.net
Looks impressive and very lightweight for what it isReview of sigma 20-200mm
![]()
Review: Sigma 20-200mm 3.5-6.3 DG C - Better than you Think
The Sigma 20-200mm 3.5-6.3 DG DN Contemporary is the only 10x zoom starting at an impressive 20mm, but how does it compare tophillipreeve.net
Looks great, no apologies necessary.
Most of my holiday snaps and dog walk photos will be going in the Fuji thread now, will give you all a nice break![]()
You may recall I was never too impressed with the Fuji output but it is much better now, and I'm really enjoying the X100VI. In terms of a user experience it's much nicer than the RX1R II, and IQ is 95% as good.As like me you can tend to dive a little deeply into thingsI'm a bit surprised you've gone for a X100 although I know you compared the Fuji to the RX1. OK I've only had earlier ones, S and F, but apart from the look of the camera and the controls and the good evf everything else was a disappointment for me even compared to my GX9 and GX80 let alone my Sony A7's.
I've hung on to my MFT kit because of the 14mm f2.5, 45-150mm and 100-400mm but recently after using the A7cII and 40mm the gap in IQ between my A7cII and GX80 seems to be significant whereas when I had just the A7 the gap didn't seem quite so big.
I can see myself buying a second A7c camera especially if they bring out one with the do it all back screen so that I can have a 40mm and a 24mm on two cameras ready to go, but I'd rather have 28 and 40mm. Actually if they do bring out an A7c with the do it all screen I might buy two as I don't like the articulating screen and I'm finding that I'm getting an increased number of pictures which need straightening.
The rx1r series is the type of camera that induces comments around Sony being an electronics company and not a camera company. Impressive tech but a pig to use.You may recall I was never too impressed with the Fuji output but it is much better now, and I'm really enjoying the X100VI. In terms of a user experience it's much nicer than the RX1R II, and IQ is 95% as good.
FTFYYou may recall I was never too impressed with the Fuji output but it is much better now, and I'm really enjoying the X100VI. In terms of a user experience it's much nicer than the RX1R II, and IQ is 5% as good.
I don't think it's a pig to use per se, I think it's more a case of it being 10+ year old tech. There's no animal AF, there's no ability to BBF, and the user UI is slow, ofr example reviewing images can be annoying. Beautiful images though and lovely bokeh.The rx1r series is the type of camera that induces comments around Sony being an electronics company and not a camera company. Impressive tech but a pig to use.
phillipreeve.net
DSC08984.jpg by Keith, on Flickr
DSC08985.jpg by Keith, on Flickr
May 2026-6 by Ben Cheneler, on Flickr
May 2026-7 by Ben Cheneler, on Flickr
May 2026 by Ben Cheneler, on Flickr
May 2026-5 by Ben Cheneler, on Flickr
Indeed, makes sigma tele lenses more appealing now. They are all limited to 15fps but at least we have working option for TC.I'd be very happy with that kit and the results. Well done![]()
15fps is enough imo.Indeed, makes sigma tele lenses more appealing now. They are all limited to 15fps but at least we have working option for TC.
Just hoping viltrox make a 1.4x TC now
Which other lenses does it work with other than the 500mm?Indeed, makes sigma tele lenses more appealing now. They are all limited to 15fps but at least we have working option for TC.
Just hoping viltrox make a 1.4x TC now
Yeah should he for majority of time. Would have been nice to push to 20fps but not end of the world15fps is enough imo.
Most of them i believe but i have seen it tested with 300-600mm and 70-200mmWhich other lenses does it work with other than the 500mm?
200mm f2?Yeah should he for majority of time. Would have been nice to push to 20fps but not end of the world
Most of them i believe but i have seen it tested with 300-600mm and 70-200mm
200mm f2?
Hmmmm just I wonder how many months until a z mount tc is releasedMight work, though I haven't seen reports. Works with sigma 100mm f2.8 macro also
Next time I'm in town i can try testing it if Wex have a copy of sigma 200mm f2
Certainly a tempting combination....
Apparently works with laowa 200mm f2
View: https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=4361085494154386&id=100007589355024
Hmmmm just I wonder how many months until a z mount tc is released