- Messages
- 8,444
- Edit My Images
- No
But lots Leica. It's classCould be worse, look at what Leica charge for a slow focusing brick that gives banding under artificial light and a standard zoom.
But lots Leica. It's classCould be worse, look at what Leica charge for a slow focusing brick that gives banding under artificial light and a standard zoom.
Very true, with Sony you are getting great technology and forward progress.... its a great system just like Fuji.Could be worse, look at what Leica charge for a slow focusing brick that gives banding under artificial light and a standard zoom.
Really, its only probably the build and brand which is class, the tech isn't..... isn't it mostly Panasonic or is it Panasonic who use Leica tech?But lots Leica. It's class
Very true, with Sony you are getting great technology and forward progress.... its a great system just like Fuji.
You guys crack me up. Seriously.
Of course they use Panasonic tech why the hell wouldn't they.
Panasonic use LG panels in there £7k TV! It doesn't make it s***. They tech that tech and move it on.
I bet Sony don't even make their own stuff in there camera. Bet there are parts outsourced.
You guys crack me up. Seriously.
Of course they use Panasonic tech why the hell wouldn't they.
Panasonic use LG panels in there £7k TV! It doesn't make it s***. They tech that tech and move it on.
I bet Sony don't even make their own stuff in there camera. Bet there are parts outsourced.
Yes but that issue with the AF is a minor set back as the images are superb and surely thats key right. f*** if they are focus or not.Ah but Leica have to add their unique unicorn tears to the camera in their secret laboratory in Germany ;0)
I agree that the SL is an impressive slab of aluminium but surely what's more important is the way a camera performs? If it's only using Contrast Detect AF, it's technically no better than an original A7 in actual performance regardless of the brand loyalty. Dan's already said a few times that the AF performance as the light gets lower can be hit and miss so he stops down the aperture and uses multi-point autofocus to try and capture the right moments. (Edit, this is the same problem with all contrast-detect only mirrorless cameras, hence the introduction of phase detect AF in later Sonys)
Yes but that issue with the AF is a minor set back as the images are superb and surely thats key right. f*** if they are focus or not.
They ain't superb if the images are out of focus.Yes but that issue with the AF is a minor set back as the images are superb and surely thats key right. f*** if they are focus or not.
Ah but Leica have to add their unique unicorn tears to the camera in their secret laboratory in Germany ;0)
Sony are sterile and Fuji are in denial.
Let's bash all the brands..yay...
I'm sold! #cheapI fully agree Dan. Everyone needs a Chroma (once my Kickstarter gets launched) and get shooting large format instead of using these tiny sensors ;0)
That's Sony sensor. Battery and cpu inside that sony. They don't outsource a lot of stuff.You guys crack me up. Seriously.
Of course they use Panasonic tech why the hell wouldn't they.
Panasonic use LG panels in there £7k TV! It doesn't make it s***. They tech that tech and move it on.
I bet Sony don't even make their own stuff in there camera. Bet there are parts outsourced.
It's these comments why I left here before!They ain't superb if the images are out of focus.
The sl is an expensive paper weight. Seriously get an a9 or a d5 for the same price. Or just flush 5k down the toilet.
Or just flush 5k down the toilet.
I'm sold! #cheap
A9 ain't a crappie cameraJonney i'd say you've flushed more than 5k down the toilet.. poor cameras need a real owner.
A9 ain't a crappie camera
Nothing goes over my head. My reflexes are too fast, I would catch it
Perfect moody grey or p***ed off brown are my idealsExcellent, I'll get your name down for one. You can have it in a range of colours to suit your style too :0)
Ordered your Sony yet?Whooooosh
Ordered your Sony yet?
It's banter bruv. Chill.It's these comments why I left here before!
Quality of the raws?I already decided I would miss the quality of my camera if I were to sell it, so no - not ordering a Sony
Quality of the raws?
Perfect moody grey or p***ed off brown are my ideals
Calm down Neil, people are only having fun. It's all in fun and fun is essential and if you feel the heat too much just go back and look at some of the pictures I've posted and then you'll really have some ammo to fireIt's these comments why I left here before!
For me I don't see the quality of raws and glass better then Sony or Canon.Quality of raws, camera and glass.
I was torn between the Loxia and the Distagon after trying it actually... cost isn't massively different and the AF and f1.4 would probably make the difference, looming possibility of a Sigma Art f1.4 35mm though means the Distagon has gone back, too big to carry all the time, might as well just carry the 24-70 GM!
For e mount?Sigma are releasing a 24-70 art soon!!
Who knows! MaybeFor e mount?
Who knows! Maybe
I'm waiting for a 12mm F2.8 or more from sigma xxxNope.
I'm waiting for a 12mm F2.8 or more from sigma xxx
How so? I do still have ef mount.You're in the wrong system unless you like waiting a long time. DSLR users are getting a 14 1.8 soon.