- Messages
- 8,016
- Name
- David
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Thanks Dave funny enough I was thinking along the same lines as you I was all set to wait a couple of years and get a GFX but then I got thinking about the price, what I wanted was at least the 23mm, 32-65 and the 110 or 200mm ( might have the exact focal lengths wrong but hopefully I'm close enough) and I was looking at north of 7 or 8 grand plus would have liked to keep the 100-400 plus a x body.
I like the Sony find it handles pretty well not as good as X-H1 but still pretty good, just about got it customised as I want it so don't really have to touch the menus now and to be honest don't think there are as bad as people say, different to be sure but did think that about the Fuji when I first got one.
Did miss the mp when I switched from Nikon to Fuji, as most people don't think I really need 95% of the time but i do find it very nice to have, goes without saying the iq is stellar and really like the dr.
Pet hate is the colour of the af point I am forever struggling to see where it is.
Overall happy with the switch, miss the Fuji film sims but generally like the colours the Sony gives.
Mind you when I win the lottery I'm off to buy a gfx and all the lenses.
Funnily enough its not the cost of change/upgrade to either of these systems that's making me hesitant but the weight, I originally got into the Fuji system (X100) and loved the reduction in bag weight, and sometimes I wish I could be more sensible and just carry the X100F + WCL again!!
But I'm definitely craving more MP, and an increased Dynamic Range, and I think I have to accept that this comes with a weight penalty. Quality Modern FF Glass is also getting a bit lardy.
If only I could simplify........