- Messages
- 343
- Name
- Rick
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I've just received my official Fuji RR-90 remote. Simple and NOT worth the £50+ I see them for.
Got it for £25 on Amazon.
even the £25 from Amazon is pushing it..cheapo plastic remote.
I've just received my official Fuji RR-90 remote. Simple and NOT worth the £50+ I see them for.
Got it for £25 on Amazon.
SnapThats the one i have, does the job nicely.
What chargers are people using? stock ones? dual ebay/amazon specials?
I know Hahnel are making a pro-cube twin charger due out soon but I dont wanna wait!
What chargers are people using? stock ones? dual ebay/amazon specials?
I know Hahnel are making a pro-cube twin charger due out soon but I dont wanna wait!
What chargers are people using? stock ones? dual ebay/amazon specials?
I know Hahnel are making a pro-cube twin charger due out soon but I dont wanna wait!
If at home, either an original Fuji one (I have 3 cameras that take the same battery so 3 chargers for them!) or a universal one, whichever comes to hand first. On holiday, the universal, a Hahnel UniPal Plus (which I got with a 2nd hand Nikon I bought for my MiL for which LCE had lost the original charger. The Hahnel one was priced at the same I paid for the camera!) http://www.amazon.co.uk/Hahnel-Unipal-Universal-Battery-Charger/dp/B009LM3V5E
The 1.4 T/C arrived this evening, so I had to pop outside for a quick test. With my new 100-400mm I'll be giving it a more thorough test at the weekend.
Moon @ 400mm by Andrew Colgan, on Flickr
Moon @ 560mm by Andrew Colgan, on Flickr
Yes, absolutely. You'll struggle to beat it.Can someone recommend a good starter lens for the X-T10? 18-55 a good bet?
Can someone recommend a good starter lens for the X-T10? 18-55 a good bet?
Both the 18-55mm and 16-50mm are excellent lenses. The 16-50mm is lighter, but has a slower max aperture / no aperture ring / less efficient optical stabilisation / mostly plastic build. The 18-55mm is pitched a little higher (and the lens I tend to use the most) but optically, both are very good indeed - you can use either from wide open with great results.
Can someone recommend a good starter lens for the X-T10? 18-55 a good bet?
With all the hassle over cashback you could make an argument for buying s/h from a good dealer. Fuji haven't exactly covered themselves in glory have they?Wonder when Fujis next promo will be, Panasonics just launched theirs for Easter.
With all the hassle over cashback you could make an argument for buying s/h from a good dealer. Fuji haven't exactly covered themselves in glory have they?
Excellent lens however you may need a grip. I know some people were fine with it but I found it a bit top heavy when I used to have an X-T10, I sold the 18-55 for a 16-50 which was balanced better for me. Both lenses are excellent, you may struggle but if you can find a shop with both in may be worth you taking the body and trying them out.
With all the hassle over cashback you could make an argument for buying s/h from a good dealer. Fuji haven't exactly covered themselves in glory have they?
I love mine. And it's so discounted bought with the X-T10 that if you don't like it, you can probably sell it at a profit! Having said that, most of the XC16-50 owners seem pretty happy too. I would recommend an L-bracket with grip (eBay can provide) but YMMV.Can someone recommend a good starter lens for the X-T10? 18-55 a good bet?
If anyone is looking for a 18-135 I think this is an absolute bargain http://www.wexphotographic.com/buy-used-fuji-18-135mm-f3-5-5-6-wr-lm-r-ois-fujinon-lens/p1586591
I've not used the 18-55, but the 18-135 is a cracking lens. Very useful focal length range for a 1 lens solution when out and about, weather resistant and nice and sharp. OIS is decent too.Ooh now I wish I hadn't of clicked that link
I need to get a zoom to go with my 18 and 27 on my xpro 1
I was thinking of the 18-55 how do the 2 compare?
Ooh now I wish I hadn't of clicked that link
I need to get a zoom to go with my 18 and 27 on my xpro 1
I was thinking of the 18-55 how do the 2 compare?
Very well. The 18-55 is a bit faster in terms of maximum aperture but the 18-135 has the extra reach and an extra stop or so of stabilisation not to mention the weather resistance especially when on an X-T1.
It is bigger and heavier though, so it depends really on how much weight you're happy with swinging around your neck Looks a great all rounder though!
My X-T1 lives on a narrow neoprene strap and is far lighter than the alternative D750 with the 24-120 f/4! The extra versatility of the 18-135 swings it for me as well. Not knocking the 18-55 - I have one of those too, although it may get sold should I decide to get a 100-400.
My X-T1 lives on a narrow neoprene strap and is far lighter than the alternative D750 with the 24-120 f/4! The extra versatility of the 18-135 swings it for me as well. Not knocking the 18-55 - I have one of those too, although it may get sold should I decide to get a 100-400.