- Messages
- 3,434
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I have the 14, 35 and 56. Also had the 23. I enjoy them all but the 35 is the most I use out of the bunch. It is sharp and fast, a bit noise but I can live with that
Thanks for sharing .Fwiw, this has just been posted..
Compared to the Nikon, it starts to look handy.
35 gets the most use here as well (have 10-24, 35 and 56) - mostly due to its form factor, if I'm honest. I'll probably get the X100T before I get the 23 just to finally have that "always with me" camera.I have the 14, 35 and 56. Also had the 23. I enjoy them all but the 35 is the most I use out of the bunch. It is sharp and fast, a bit noise but I can live with that
Thanks for sharing .
Do we know when this will be available in the UK?
I'm really torn with the 50-140... in some shots it looks stupidly bulky, in others it actually looks reasonable!
http://www.bestmirrorlesscamerarevi...e-xf-50-140mm-f2-8-xf-56mm-f1-2-apd-and-more/
On another note... I'm not sure whether to get the 23mm or an X100T... I'm sure this decision has been faced before, there's even an entire website about it: http://www.fujivsfuji.com/x100s-vs-23mm-14/ - what has everyone here gone with in the end?
I have a horrible decision to make! My 18-55mm is now fully functional again...so I have both it and the 16-50mm XC lens. Which do I keep?! The XC is optically every bit as good as the XF, it's lighter too. The XF feels 10x nicer though, and doesn't click into place at the long end! Arghhh!!
18-55 mm crystal clear to me, what do you think ?I have a horrible decision to make! My 18-55mm is now fully functional again...so I have both it and the 16-50mm XC lens. Which do I keep?! The XC is optically every bit as good as the XF, it's lighter too. The XF feels 10x nicer though, and doesn't click into place at the long end! Arghhh!!
Anyone recommend a 3rd party battery for the Fuji X-T1?
I find that the XT-1 eats batteries. I'm lucky to get 5 hours out of a fully charged genuine battery. I have a selection of third party batteries and they are worse!
This might be of interest, I hope I can explain it properly.....
The RAF files are not apparently recognised by some bits of software. Windows haven't updated their Codec yet. The files can be opened and viewed in Lightroom. If you try and view them in Bridge you just get an icon, although they can be worked on in ACR and Photoshop.
Faststone Image viewer has no problems viewing the images - I wonder why??
I thought about converting the RAF files to DNG for viewing and processing and downloaded the latest Adobe DNG convertor. When I opened this no files were shown, but....if you select the folder that has RAF files that the convertor cannot see and tell it to do the conversion a miraculous thing happens. The files are recognised and converted to DNG. Then you can view them in Windows, Bridge or wherever. Sounds odd, but we are dealing with Adobe!
Hope that's of use to someone - if you can understand me!
Really? Maybe I have done the wrong update. Have you a link?
Must admit I normally download through Lightroom which presents no problems.
Ah, that might explain it. I'm not on CC, and maybe this is an example of Adobe not giving any further updates to non CC users. Wouldn't surprise me, especially as LR has updated, but that remains available as stand alone.
Not had problems with greying out although the initial previews before I press the import button have never ever been sharp enough for initial discarding of the crap!
I got these and found them to be just as good as the original.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B007VPL61Y?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o02_s00
Hi All,
I've had the Xpro-1 for over a year now and I don't know if I'm just getting ready for a change, but the XP-1's autofocus is just really annoying me now. I also have a D7000 and that pretty much stayed in the bag because I loved the Fuji. I took the Nikon out again the other day and the AF is just soooo much better. I am now almost hating the XP-1 and jst want to get rid.
I have fancied the XT-1 for a while - honestly, is the AF any better or even as good as a DSLR? I'm tempted to go full frame and get an X100 for a 'pocket' camera, but I have a few XF lenses and I do love the Fuji IQ when it gets it right. Can the XT-1 seriously be a contender against a DSLR?
Jim.
Definitely states all lenses have to be bought in the same transaction, reckon you might have to claim separately.