Outstanding first lap of the "this is definitely not a race" this afternoon by Alonso.
And just as in football, if the authorities allow it (which F1 does - Wolff was told he could do it by the F1 Race Director) then it will continue to happen.TBH, I reckon both team principals deserve a race ban for their attempts to influence the stewards - as bad as footballers crowding round the ref!
At the time of watching it, with the on-board and slo- mo reviews.
It seemed to me that LH made a legitimate move approaching the corner and had obtained 'in effect' control of the corner. However, they were both carrying too much speed to both make the turn on anything like the racing line. Whether LH lifted or braked.....he still had the corner.
IMO it was a racing incident by two hard chargers, though if there is any blame i see MV as primary trigger of the incident.
er except he did twice more overtaking exactly at that corner during the race including in the dying laps to take Leclerc. He was completely alongside to the point where he needed to turn. If Max had simply run wide there would not be any sort of debate but emotions are running high because of the impact. If the stewards are not carefull no one will try overtaking and we will end up with the processionary races from a few years back. I dont see anyone complaining about max banging wheels with lewis down the straight previous. Had there been no contact and Lewis made the move he would be hailed as a god.it was a desparate move by hamilton , he would never have made the corner ,once he lifted it was maxs corner , he should have been tight to the apex which he missed thats why he was given the penalty hes been making mistakes all season , this is the third time hes taken a red bull out with his ill judged attempts.
I get this and we have to be careful as we don't want to go back to the yawn of F1 from recent years, these guys are racers and this is what they do, I do think if roles were reversed both Max and Lewis would have done exactly the same thing, it definitely makes it more exciting for us spectatorser except he did twice more overtaking exactly at that corner during the race including in the dying laps to take Leclerc. He was completely alongside to the point where he needed to turn. If Max had simply run wide there would not be any sort of debate but emotions are running high because of the impact. If the stewards are not carefull no one will try overtaking and we will end up with the processionary races from a few years back. I dont see anyone complaining about max banging wheels with lewis down the straight previous. Had there been no contact and Lewis made the move he would be hailed as a god.
was it Senna who said 'if you stop going for a gap that doesn't exist then you stop being a racing driver'?
I don't think the Max / Lewis incident was poor or aggressive driving, I just think they both wanted it and didn't back down.Yes it was Senna who said that, he was replying to a question that Jackie Stewart asked. The question was "why have you had more accidents with other drivers than every other World Champion"? or words to that effect.
Since then Senna's comment gets used to defend poor/over aggresive driving.
I saw it the same as you and I've been surprised it's hardly been mentioned.However, I did note that Max pulled to the left to block LH, then cut back, isn't "weaving" outlawed these days.
In my book, the 10 second penalty was a cop out. Not doing anything would have had Red Bull frothing from the mouth, doing more would have seen Mercedes doing the same. Max is a brilliant young driver but he can be over ambitious at times, and I think Lewis was at a point of "it's all or nothing" to keep the title. All in all, nothing more than a racing incident.
However, I did note that Max pulled to the left to block LH, then cut back, isn't "weaving" outlawed these days.
Red Bull would say he was moving back to the racing line and you are allowed one move to defend and you can still return to the line.
This is the first time I've heard a team principal moaning about the cost of damage to the car and surely they have some kind of insurance to cover it?
I'm pretty sure they have no insurance for the cars, staff members yes but not cars.
Plus all teams have had their budget cut to $175m so the damage costs to that car will be substantial, I'm guessing over $1m?
EDIT: Just googles it, damage costs are $1.8m
It will be interesting to see (if we do) what RB have found in the data that the stewards didnt have access to
Rummours say lewis was too fast for the corner and was using max to make it but the stewards have way more data to sort that one
No new data no review
Could all end up with teddy on the floor and stamping of Horners feet
So did I, interesting that it's only the media again who are pushing the whole Lewis slow lap thing at the end of Q3, the drivers and Red Bull didn't seem too concerned with it, it'll be an interesting start tomorrow with Lewis and Bottas on medium and the rest of the grid on softs.I enjoyed that (quali)
With Hamilton winningI hope there's no first lap incidents tomorrow and we have a good competitive race