Tilt or Shift?

Ambermile

A Whole Lot of Sparkle..
Messages
4,126
Name
Arthur
Edit My Images
No
Which is best, Tilt or Shift? Given one or the other, I would have though tilt was the most versatile? I realise that it is situation dependent to some degree but I am talking about in general here.

Arthur
 
Hmm - unexpected reply, but understandable. Do more people use these for architecture then?
 
Can you get lenses with only one of the movements? I thought they all had both?:shrug:

Shift and tilt for architecture (one to get the composition and verticals sorted and the other to maximise DOF).
 
Can you get lenses with only one of the movements? I thought they all had both?:shrug:

Most are (were) shift only. The current Canikon offerings are tilt/shift.
 
there's a nice article in this month's EOS Magazine. Helped me understand a little more of what they actually do!
 
you can go a long way to achieving the same effect using Photoshop.

Wash your mouth out, you pixel smearer! ;)

A problem with the results of shift corrections is that we've been educated to view the built environment through a lens (without shift).
 
I experimented with Shift on Wells Cathedral.
The results are very impressive, but you can go a long way to achieving the same effect using Photoshop.
However, tilt is very special and it cannot be reproduced with post-processing.

Yup, it was that sequence got me thinking. I assume then tilt is a good thing, shift is OK but you can get away without it?

Arthur
 
Can you get away with a kit lens for a paid job?
 
Well, been having a play and my "experiments" bring me to the conclusion that tilt is much more fun that shift... yes?


Arthur
 
Tilt and shift both have their uses, of course tilt at 90 degrees becomes swing.

I currently have two tilt/shift lenses (24L2 and 90) but unfortunately even I am surpassed by the mighty (figuratively speaking) Canon Bob who has three 24L, 45 & 90.

They are some of the most useful lenses you could use and on my 1D Mk3 i would have kept the 24L2 as my standard lens, now I have 1Ds3 I suspect that the 45TSE would make a better standard lens.

There is another fantastic use for a TS lens you can expand the sensor size and resolution to MF standards, if you shoot in portrait mode on a 1Ds3 and take a 12 degree shifted image to the left and right, and stitch them together you will end up with an image 7226 x 5627 pixels and a 116MB file.

This is a full size representation of a three image stitch that I have just taken on the 90mm TS-E in portrait mode with 11, 0, 11 degrees of shift and resized for the web. This gives an angle of view along the horizontal similar to that of a 60mm lens.

Large1small.jpg


This is a 100% crop from the original high res image!

large100.jpg


Another 100% crop

Larg100crop.jpg
 
Thanks Ed - I am actually thinking of making rather than buying - just wanted to do it in stages though, hence the "which is more important" question.

Anyway, a 12 degree shifted? is that 12 degree tilt and a shift as well?

Arthur
 
Thanks Ed - I am actually thinking of making rather than buying - just wanted to do it in stages though, hence the "which is more important" question.

Anyway, a 12 degree shifted? is that 12 degree tilt and a shift as well?

Arthur

Hi Arthur,

The TS-E 24 has +/- 8 degrees of tilt (angular) and +/- 11mm shift (Linear) movements.

Trev
 
Thanks Trev, so where from that 12 degree?
 
Only the 17L & 24L Mk2 have 12mm of shift the older TSE's 24L, 45 & 90 only have 11mm of shift. The 17L only has 6.5 degrees of tilt/swing the 24L Mk2 has 8.5 degrees of tilt/swing, the original models all have 8 degrees of tilt/swing.
 
Back
Top