1. zendog

    zendog

    Messages:
    302
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I had a go at this last time with poor results so any tips would be welcome.

    Specifically

    How to get the exposure right - manual or camera, maximum shutter speed.
    ISO
    Focus - manual or camera
    I'll be using a Tamron 70- 300 on a Canon 60D (tripod and remote). Would you add a 1.4 Kenco Teleplus?

    Anything else

    Cheers
    Steve
     
  2. GreenNinja67

    GreenNinja67

    Messages:
    3,614
    Name:
    Terry
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    It'll still be small.

    I'd try and get hold of a 600mm minimum and spot meter on the moon.

    1/250 f8 won't be far out at 100 or 200 ISO I'd have thought.

    I put my camera on my telescope last time I shot the moon which converted it into a 2400mm telephoto lens EFL.


    [​IMG]Moon Mono by Terence Rees, on Flickr
     
  3. Mr Pid

    Mr Pid

    Messages:
    123
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    You need a surprisingly fast enough shutter - the moon rises and sets at a very fast rate.

    I regularly photograph the moon when out doing wildlife when I get bored, hand held at 700mm and the results are still as good as a tripod.

    Usually around F8, ISO800 ish and a shutter speed of between 1/500 - 1/1250
     
  4. Jannyfox

    Jannyfox

    Messages:
    2,994
    Name:
    Jan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Lunar eclipses aka blood moons are very much darker than a normal Moon (obviously) but can be very variable, so getting the right exposure is going to be down to experimentation. But it won't be going anywhere fast so bracketing widely is the order of the day. The one in September 2015 I shot at iso800, f5.6 and exposures of 1 and 2 seconds! I was using a 300mm lens on a Canon crop sensor as that was the longest lens I had then, shooting off a fixed tripod. Now I'd use 600mm (if it wasn't forecast to be completely cloudy where I am on Friday) though the longer the focal length the quicker you'd get the Moon's movement kicking in. My 2015 shots are time stamped at about 0300 but that's UT so 0200 BST. It just means the Moon was high in the sky, not just rising as it will be on Friday, so there was longer till movement became a factor. 2015 was a very dark eclipse. Friday's may be brighter but we won't know till it happens. I thought my camera would struggle to autofocus as the Moon was so dark so I tried a mix of auto and manual. I'm crap at judging manual focus (long sighted) so I think the autofocus worked better. I would have used my usual technique of autofocus then lock focus on the lens.
     
  5. zendog

    zendog

    Messages:
    302
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Would love a 600mm but it's a bit hard to justify for a few moon shots.

    So the plan is to have a practice tomorrow with a start point of:

    Lens at about 280mm no extender.
    Spot metering
    Manual exposure 1/250 f8 auto ISO
    1 stop exposure bracketing
    Tripod / remote shutter / drive 2 second delay
    Try autofocus on centre point (my eyes are poor too) then switch to manual on lens. I'm set up for BBF anyway..

    Anything else.

    What do you want to bet it's cloudy Friday?

    Cheers
    Steve
     
    Last edited: Jul 25, 2018
  6. huffy

    huffy

    Messages:
    2,124
    Name:
    Mark
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  7. StewartR

    StewartR Efrem Zimbalist Jr Advertiser

    Messages:
    11,580
    Name:
    Stewart
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    That exposure will be OK for a (nearly) full moon but will be way out for an eclipsed moon. See the post from @Jannyfox above and also these references:
    "What will 2018's and 2019's lunac eclipses look like?" - http://www.eclipsewise.com/lunar/LEnews/LEmore/TLE2018keen.html
    "How to photograph a lunar eclipse" - http://www.mreclipse.com/LEphoto/LEphoto.html

    There is an amazing single-photo multiple exposure timelapse of an eclipse (shot on film!!!!!), about half way down the page of that second resource. The caption says "The basic exposure of 1/125 second at f/5.6 was increased to 1/8 second within 15 minutes of totality and then set to 4 seconds throughout totality." That illustrates the issue nicely.

    Tripod, remote and manual focus won't be needed during practice but will during eclipse.
     
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2018
    Jannyfox likes this.
  8. GTG

    GTG Suspended / Banned

    Messages:
    1,795
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I would try ISO 100, f8 and whatever shutter speed is needed to get the cleanest image with least noise.

    I do not believe the moon rises and sets so fast that you need a fast shutter speed and auto ISO.
     
  9. StewartR

    StewartR Efrem Zimbalist Jr Advertiser

    Messages:
    11,580
    Name:
    Stewart
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    You normally don't need to worry about the speed of the moon's motion in the sky.

    Earlier this year, this cropped up in the Sigma 150-600mm thread. The author had used a shutter speed of 1/320th, at 600mm focal length on a 24 megapixel DX camera. It worked out that the moon would have moved by 0.04 pixels whilst his shutter was open.

    Ordinarily it's easy to obtain a fast shutter speed, even at night, because the moon is in full sunlight - but during the eclipse you might need to make some trade-offs. If you have a 24 mp crop-sensor camera (fairly standard sort of kit these days), the moon moves roughly 1 pixel per second for every 50mm of focal length. (So with a 300mm lens, 6 pixels per second, etc.) You can use this to work out what kind of shutter speed you need to freeze the motion, and adjust the aperture and/or ISO accordingly to get the exposure right.
     
    Craig_85 and GTG like this.
  10. HoppyUK

    HoppyUK

    Messages:
    22,715
    Name:
    Richard
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Interesting calculation, but way way down the list of sharpness concerns after focusing, camera-shake, mirror-slap and shutter-shock, not to mention lens resolution and AA filter etc. Pixel level definition is very hard to achieve at the best of times. Panning perhaps?
     
  11. StewartR

    StewartR Efrem Zimbalist Jr Advertiser

    Messages:
    11,580
    Name:
    Stewart
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Oh, I agree totally, but it's only way down the list because I've done the calculation. If you were worried about the speed of the moon's motion, as the previous poster seemed to be, then you might be trying to use an unnecessarily fast shutter speed in addition to all those other issues. My calculation shows that you don't have to.
     
    Last edited: Jul 27, 2018
    HoppyUK and Graham W like this.
  12. HoppyUK

    HoppyUK

    Messages:
    22,715
    Name:
    Richard
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Haha I thought you were being serious!

    I've never done that calculation but whenever this subject comes up, I just imagine what photographing a snail with a 600mm lens would be like, given that the snail would be moving faster across the frame than the moon. But also, if that calculation was used to photograph any typical fast moving subject, we'd all be looking for that elusive 1/1,000,000sec shutter speed.

    Looking at it another way, if we apply the same standard of 'acceptable sharpness' that is used in the universal depth-of-field formula to that same 24mp APS-C sensor (CoC 0.02mm) in your example, the subject would have to move over 5 pixels before sharpness began to suffer visibly.
     
  13. Cagey75

    Cagey75

    Messages:
    9,578
    Name:
    Keith
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Depends on the conditions at the time, normally a low ISO, fast shutter speed will do the job as the moon can be extremely bright, but during eclips it can get pretty dark. This is an old image I took during a 'waxing crescent' [when the moon becomes visible again after eclipse]

    0.8sec exposure

    [​IMG]Waxing crescent by K G, on Flickr
     
    Last edited: Jul 27, 2018
    Mr Pid likes this.
  14. StewartR

    StewartR Efrem Zimbalist Jr Advertiser

    Messages:
    11,580
    Name:
    Stewart
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Oh, that's interesting.

    I'm not sure we can apply the same standard of 'acceptable sharpness' in this case though. With a 600mm lens, the diameter of the image of the moon on the sensor will be about 5mm. So anyone who takes such a shot will almost certainly (*) be cropping significantly. How does that affect the DOF/COC calculations and hence the implied limit to shatpness.

    (*) Unless there's a compositional reason not to crop, as in Cagey75's photo above.
     
    Cagey75 likes this.
  15. Pete B

    Pete B

    Messages:
    537
    Name:
    Pete
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Top tip, go somewhere that isn't covered by clouds :grumpy:
     
  16. artyman

    artyman

    Messages:
    10,329
    Name:
    Ken
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    We've had clear skies for weeks, when a bit of cloud would have been welcome to block the sun's heat and today when you want it clear we have cloud :mad:
     
  17. Mr Badger

    Mr Badger

    Messages:
    3,189
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    It's an astronomical event and it's Britain, it was always going to be cloudy, what did you expect?! ;)
     
  18. Cagey75

    Cagey75

    Messages:
    9,578
    Name:
    Keith
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Typical Irish midlands ... it's bucketing down here :rolleyes:
     
  19. HoppyUK

    HoppyUK

    Messages:
    22,715
    Name:
    Richard
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Well you could apply the same way of thinking if you wanted to, which is kind of looking at it down the other end of the telescope so to speak. That is, start with an acceptable standard of sharpness in the final image (as the depth-of-field formula does*) and work that back to the sensor. Cropping has the same effect as increased focal length, ie it's just extra magnification, so you could simply apply a crop factor to the calcs.

    But I'm not sure it's relevant in this example, as subject movement is a long way down the list of significant variables when shooting the moon, a lot less important than focus accuracy and camera movement/shake with a long lens.

    *the whole depth-of-field concept is based on a single basic assumption - that the average human eye cannot discern detail smaller than 0.2mm in a ten inch print held at normal viewing distance (roughly 12in). Everything is worked back from that. It's a universal standard that's been used for many decades, and it still applies pretty well today to the level of sharpness you get looking at a typical computer screen or a printed magazine page.
     
  20. zendog

    zendog

    Messages:
    302
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Shame no one bet me. 10 10's cloud for the whole thing - sigh.
     
  21. Erty

    Erty

    Messages:
    69
    Name:
    Andrew
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Tip from me- go out the night before and find out where the moon will be at eclipse time. Bring a compass. I couldn't see it through the slight cloud/ city haze until it started to go out of the Earth's shadow. It was there but not enough contrast to pick out. Live and learn.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice