Touching up Her Majesties breasts.

Huujuu

Huujuu

Messages
601
Name
Ian
Edit My Images
Yes
I saw this photo by Chris Levine on the front of the times magazine today and i dont know whats been done to her chest, but it didnt strike me as being particularly subtle. Even her pearls are dodgy.....and this is an iconic image ? (yes, i think it is, but thats not the point)

You may have seen the image before, i found it on the web here http://andrewsherman.blogspot.com/2009/08/chris-levines-portrait-of-queen.html
 
I agree from the neck down it just does not seem natural,

Surely there should be some sort of creases in the top, I just cannot see the queen where spandex tops:lol:
 
Its not at all flattering as far as I am concerned
 
Not sure it has anything to do with the PP applied to the portrait but it was commissioned for a hollogram I believe.
 
Took so long posting Yv beat me to it!
 
Hologram......that explains it, you wouldnt want a tour of the queens 3 dimensional attributes to be too....er......whats the word ?

I'm still a little surprised that it was deemed 'suitable' for the whole picture to be shown on a front cover (thats not my opinion, just one gleaned from a pervasive opinion that photographs should at least be realistic where possible/appropriate)
 
Crikey she looks rough! Andy that great was that suit under the dodgy Photoshopped layer? :lol:
 
Sheeesshhh .... imagine sneaking into buckingham palace at night to find that vampire!
 
Not one for dissing other people work when they are not here to defend...but on the basis that indeed, it's a holograph, and therefore it CAN'T look good in it's current format...I think it stinks.

She actually looks dead, and her top looks stuck on.

G.
 
Tiler65 i'm sure the law against treason still carries the death sentence :lol:
 
The Beefeaters are knocking on his door as we speak! :wave:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top