Once again some very very kind and complimentory words to which I can only say thanks again for
Sie,
You're capable of great pictures when the conditions are right.
I'm applying very high standards here but it's a bit of a shame it was such a hazy night....
Thanks.
I am afraid I am going to bow out of the debate here. I already have a reputation on here for saying my piece and then droning on and on about it so this time I am going to keep a low profile
I do however want to share my thoughts on the Haze.
The haze in Snowdonia in my experiance seems to occupy the early months of the year. It is apparently due to French farmers doing something with crops at this time of year and it is at it's worst after a period of high pressure and consistant dry weather. I have been scuppered by it time and time again during wild camps and with tremendous frustration. To the point that I have been literally praying it had cleared as I opened my tent on the morning before dawn. There have been wild camps where I didn't even bother to take a shot because I did not have the light I wanted on the distant peaks.
That is until I watched an epsiode of the luminous landscape video journal and Michael Reichmann made a comment to a very well respected photographer that "fog, mist and haze are the photographers friend and not the enemy commonly misjudged to be". He then went on to list the reasons why which I won't bore you with but it got me thinking. What I should have done in those situations was not to try and get the images I would have gone in better atmospheric conditions but instead to change my intentions and shoot to take advantage of the conditions. Haze combined with clear foregrounds gives a feeling of depth and the scattering of the light in the haze brightens the exposure on that area and can give smooth graduations of light.
Here are my feelings as to why I think these images made as they were work better with the haze:
Image number 1 would have not worked as well without the haze as the distant hill side would not have been light enough to make the exposure work. Apart from the lake it would have darkened and would have been lost to deep shadow without which I feel these image would not have been as strong.
Images 2 & 6 I would have composed differently had the atmosphere been clearer. Perfect detail in the background would have battled with foreground for attention. I would have composed the view with much less foreground and only a smidgen of it to give a little depth and to lead in. Instead the haze once again gives the feeling of great depth as it fades into the distant.
In Image 3 the haze acts as contrast backdrop to Tryfan. Tryfan being the darker element against the light background. If it had been clear this contrast would not have existed and there would be a good chance Tryfans triangle would not have stood out as well. Once again the haze give the feeling of distance from foreground to distant peaks. This is also pre-dawn light. There was no direct sunlight at all here without the haze to lighten the distant elements they would have been quite dull.
Image 5 I think speaks for it's self
The internet is rife with outstanding landscape photography from many amatuers all doing the same thing in perfect conditions. I think I am learning to make the most of the "available light" and trying to produce more unique images that will have a better chance of standing out if only for just being different.
Amazing photos Sie. Your work really is inspiring - I must get out and about again as soon as my knees are on the mend. It's soul-destroying not to be able to get to the places I love.
Do you mind me asking how often you go to these places and find the light/weather is totally against you? Every time I've been up Snowdon I have not been able to see more than a few feet ahead of me!
Thanks very much
I go though (for me) what seems like a lot of preperation and effort to do my wild camps and yes I have been scuppered by bad light and conditions on many occasions with great frustration. Many times retreated down the mountain saying "that's it...that's the last time....never again"
I do however try to influence my luck by cross referencing weather forecasts. I use 3 sources metcheck, met-office and the mountain area forecast which although is based on the metoffice site I am pretty sure it is from a dedicated sperate data source. Here are the links for Snowdonia:
http://www.metcheck.com/V40/UK/FREE/today.asp?zipcode=snowdon
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/uk/wl/wl_forecast_weather.html
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/loutdoor/mountainsafety/snowdonia/snowdonia_latest_pressure.html
If all 3 of these agree then there is a good bet the forecast will be somewhere close. I tend to find Metcheck is the most accurate but have been times that none of them were right. It increases your odds but is no guarantee.
just fantastic, must have been up there a couple of dozen times but never been up there that early in a morning. these shots remind me of pics from Colin Prior great light and good captur.
Colin Prior was my inspiration from the start so that means a lot...thank you
#1 + #5 for me
texture in the snow on one is fantastic! must of been cold
drew
Thanks
The morning wasn't too bad but the night was horrendous. I was up all night due to high winds attacking my tent. I had all my gear and my sleeping bag on me but I was freezing cold to the point I was getting concerned. It was after that I bit the bullet and brought a higher grade sleeping bag and decided I had to live with the extra weight. I am now even more concious of making sure my camp spot is as protected from wind as possible but winds change so you can't ever be sure.