Well I'm not allowed to post adverts yet so...

  • Thread starter Thread starter budfox
  • Start date Start date
B

budfox

Guest
..I thought I'd better get busy on the forums. :)

I'm currently shooting with a D70 (with D70s firmware) and also occasionally with the wife's D50. My lens of choice is the Nikon 18-135mm DX 3.5/5.6 G ED which I find does everything I need. A snip at £120 from London Camera Exchange (lots of people trading them in for 18-200 VR's apparently).

However, having got far more time on my hands these days and also a bit of cash to spend, I am sorely tempted to upgrade to a FX model and it has to be the D700.

Reckon I'll grab a couple of 'oldie but goldie' prime lenses to get started with FX fun. Manual focus jobs, so probably a fast 24 or 28mm, a really fast 50mm and maybe an old 135mm or possibly a 70-210 zoom. Takes me back to my Canon A1 days :-)

That is all really, any thoughts on my D700 choice would be welcome.
 
Yes, I was a Canon man back in my 20's, but it's been Nikon all the way for the last few years.

For me, one thing that I touched on above puts Nikon well ahead, and that's the backwards compatibility of lenses.
 
Yes, I was a Canon man back in my 20's, but it's been Nikon all the way for the last few years.

For me, one thing that I touched on above puts Nikon well ahead, and that's the backwards compatibility of lenses.

I thought practically all the Canon lenses were backwards compatible too? Certainly all the EF lenses I've seen are or do you mean the EF-S standard for the crop-bodies?
 
Yes, I was a Canon man back in my 20's, but it's been Nikon all the way for the last few years.

For me, one thing that I touched on above puts Nikon well ahead, and that's the backwards compatibility of lenses.

The EF mount was introduced in 1987, the EF-S mount in 2003 (if that's the one you're thinking of)... but with 10 models of body capable of using the ef-s mount, it's got a place I'd say. ;)
 
The EF mount was introduced in 1987, the EF-S mount in 2003 (if that's the one you're thinking of)... but with 10 models of body capable of using the ef-s mount, it's got a place I'd say. ;)

Yeah, I was going back a few years it's true. I won't keep replying though as it looks like I'm doing something naughty to get my post count up.
 
Can I throw the question round and ask why you feel the need for full frame?

Manual focus on a pro body will certainly be easier than with a D70 but do remember you won't have a split prism, though you will get a little help from the green dot.

Also, lenses for FF will likely work out more expensive than on DX.
 
Can I throw the question round and ask why you feel the need for full frame?

Manual focus on a pro body will certainly be easier than with a D70 but do remember you won't have a split prism, though you will get a little help from the green dot.

Also, lenses for FF will likely work out more expensive than on DX.

Image quality and noise performance at high ISO settings.

I'm more than happy to cope with manual focus and I certainly expect to pay more for lenses. However those lenses will retain their value over the years.

It's just that I'm fortunate enough to be able to afford a new DSLR and I know that if I buy a DX camera, (which would be a D90) then I'll regret it.
 
Can I throw the question round and ask why you feel the need for full frame?

Manual focus on a pro body will certainly be easier than with a D70 but do remember you won't have a split prism, though you will get a little help from the green dot.

Also, lenses for FF will likely work out more expensive than on DX.

Image quality and noise performance at high ISO settings.

I'm more than happy to cope with manual focus and I certainly expect to pay more for lenses. However those lenses will retain their value over the years.

It's just that I'm fortunate enough to be able to afford a new DSLR and I know that if I buy a DX camera, (which would be a D90) then I'll regret it.


^^^ How did that happen?^^^
 
Back
Top