- Messages
- 480
- Name
- Matt
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I bought a Canon s100 a while back and although it produced some great pictures the AF was a bit slow and the battery didn't last long. Shot-to-shot with the flash on was very slow too.
I bought a Sony RX100 for the quicker AF but it wasn't as accurate as the S100 and as a result my keeper rate was way lower than the S100. I'm sure it would be fine for photos of static subject, but my son wont hang around to be photographed.
I've heard Panasonic are supposed to have very quick, accurate auto-focus but in all the online comparisons i've seen the Canon pictures seem to have much more realistic colours.
I think i'm going to have to buy another S100 but just thought i'd see if anyone has a better idea.
I bought a Sony RX100 for the quicker AF but it wasn't as accurate as the S100 and as a result my keeper rate was way lower than the S100. I'm sure it would be fine for photos of static subject, but my son wont hang around to be photographed.
I've heard Panasonic are supposed to have very quick, accurate auto-focus but in all the online comparisons i've seen the Canon pictures seem to have much more realistic colours.
I think i'm going to have to buy another S100 but just thought i'd see if anyone has a better idea.