I'm thinking of hitting up the RAF Leuchars air show next month for some pics.
I've got the ground stuff covered, okay a UWA might be nice but the trusty 24-70 will do.
Now, the last show I attended in Perth in 2010 I had the 5D and 70-200 and there was a lot of cropping required in PP. So I know I'm going to need to rent something. :nuts:
So, do I go and get the 300 f/4 or 80-400 f/4.5-5.6 VR to give me some flexibility.
Heck, I could go all out and get the 200-400 f/4 VR II but it's almost £100 more.
I'd go for the the 300 if I knew I needed fast(ish) glass but with prop'd planes I know I'll be running 1/250th at the most to capture the movement and for jets well, I could run f/5.6 and just push the ISO if required right?
The weight of the 200-400 is also a major concern which is why I'm not really considering it!
So opinions please!
EDIT: I could add the 1.4x TC to the 300mm for a bit more flexibility for not much more. I'm swaying towards the prime and TC combo at the moment if I'm honest.
I've got the ground stuff covered, okay a UWA might be nice but the trusty 24-70 will do.
Now, the last show I attended in Perth in 2010 I had the 5D and 70-200 and there was a lot of cropping required in PP. So I know I'm going to need to rent something. :nuts:
So, do I go and get the 300 f/4 or 80-400 f/4.5-5.6 VR to give me some flexibility.
Heck, I could go all out and get the 200-400 f/4 VR II but it's almost £100 more.
I'd go for the the 300 if I knew I needed fast(ish) glass but with prop'd planes I know I'll be running 1/250th at the most to capture the movement and for jets well, I could run f/5.6 and just push the ISO if required right?
The weight of the 200-400 is also a major concern which is why I'm not really considering it!
So opinions please!
EDIT: I could add the 1.4x TC to the 300mm for a bit more flexibility for not much more. I'm swaying towards the prime and TC combo at the moment if I'm honest.
Last edited:
