I've gone into CC but hardly touch PS so thinks canceling while still in 14 days and get it outright
This is correct!I pay the 8.50 a month. Spend way more than that on beer in a week. For what you get I think it's very good value
Ah - but we can't know, can we? Maybe the more users they catch in their web ....... in fairness to Adobe I think they've kept this rate for two years now. The more I think about it the more they'd lose out if they increased the subscription by a large percentage.
The pride of the Luddite! Had a few beers?I am still using Photoshop CS2 - I have never seen a reason to update it. CS2 was top-notch when new and is still the same - software doesn't wear out.
To answer the question, I would buy Lightroom outright and never bother to update it.
Good phrase.The real world's more of a muddle than that. It's a hybrid circumstance.
If you just using Lightroom and not Photoshop would you buy the Lightroom outright and upgrade let say every 2 years. Or would you take out the CC package?
There's not direct parity. For instance, in the CC version of Lightroom, you get some features you do not in the stand alone version. Boundary Warp springs to mind.... only available in the CC package.. not stand-alone.
Really. Is there a list comparing them?
Well I just checked Lightroom 6.4 does have it