ChrisR
I'm a well known grump...
- Messages
- 11,200
- Name
- Chris
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Thanks RJ... I noted in one of the posts that I had been using grads for much of the time on the west coast, but might not have been for those particular frames.
But my point in introducing that shot was more in the context that the differences visible between the different scans of the same (admittedly difficult) frame are MUCH greater than any differences I have seen so far processing a JPEG vs a TIFF from the same scan. I could find other frames that I have scanned with the same scanner, but with Silverfast SE 6 vs Vuescan, where again the scans are chalk and cheese. So, for my purposes and workflow, I am seeing no benefit in getting the TIFFs, even when "free" (I pay in significantly greater download times, and in HD and backup costs), so I'm now only getting JPEGs. ISTR that UKFL (and presumably now CFL) never even offered a TIFF option.
But my point in introducing that shot was more in the context that the differences visible between the different scans of the same (admittedly difficult) frame are MUCH greater than any differences I have seen so far processing a JPEG vs a TIFF from the same scan. I could find other frames that I have scanned with the same scanner, but with Silverfast SE 6 vs Vuescan, where again the scans are chalk and cheese. So, for my purposes and workflow, I am seeing no benefit in getting the TIFFs, even when "free" (I pay in significantly greater download times, and in HD and backup costs), so I'm now only getting JPEGs. ISTR that UKFL (and presumably now CFL) never even offered a TIFF option.