- Messages
- 231
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Is it as safe as we are led to believe?....:shrug:
[YOUTUBE]G1OlHEvPRT8[/YOUTUBE]
[YOUTUBE]G1OlHEvPRT8[/YOUTUBE]
stick one in my back garden if ya like. as long as it cuts my electricity bills.
everyone wants em, but no one wants to see em. thats the prob.
Don't they normally angle the blades so they won't spin if the wind gets too high?! Not something you see every day though, but odd someone was pointing a camera at it at the time!
From the descriptions on You Tube (Quoting high accurate sources here!) the "braking system" failed.
I "thought" in periods of high winds the blades were turned so the wind mill effect is reduced...I dont know the nature of the clip or why it happened..or why for that matter anyone was filming it...
There is currently a determined effort by the green brigade to ruin our beautiful countryside up here in Northumberland with these monstrosities:annoyed:
If anywhere in the country is capable of hosting a wind farm without it affecting too large a population it's northumberland, probably the most rural and sparsly populated county in the country.
......I wonder if the locals raised a fuss when "old fashioned" wind mills were being built every where a few hundred years ago....
What would you rathe have a coal fired power station or a nuclear one?
Perhaps that would be the solution, make them look like the old conventional windmills.Does anyone know if the off shore farm off Skegness is up and running. I was there last summer and they were finishing the footings.
Like Kev M says...coal fired or nuclear. Wind farms are the future. Quick to build, clean and safe to get rid of.
I wonder if the locals raised a fuss when "old fashioned" wind mills were being built every where a few hundred years ago....
What would you rathe have a coal fired power station or a nuclear one?
If anywhere in the country is capable of hosting a wind farm without it affecting too large a population it's northumberland, probably the most rural and sparsly populated county in the country.
Nuclear please
I'd rather live near a Nuclear plant than have wind farms destroy the countryside.
Yeah Kev, your dead right, place them where they do not affect too many people, how selfish and inconsiderate of me for not thinking of the majority:bonk::bonk::bonk:
Hydro-electric. Well seeing as half the country is regurlay flooded anyway lets just dam the rivers, flood them permanantly and get us some green energy.
We already do to a certain extent, well Russia anyway, them and Norway.so then we rely on the russians to heat us and the chinese to light us. Perfect.
Next time someone refers to the UK as England I'm going to get that wall built againSolar power? Hello, this is England.
Hydro-electric. Well seeing as half the country is regurlay flooded anyway lets just dam the rivers, flood them permanantly and get us some green energy.
A sensible mix. Utilise the green options where it's practical and sensible to do so but incorporate that with other more reliable options including nuclear.Come on then what's the solution?
We already do to a certain extent, well Russia anyway, them and Norway.
Next time someone refers to the UK as England I'm going to get that wall built again
At the same time destroying thousands of hectares of natural habitat, submerging communities etc. There are very few suitable locations for run of river generation left. More pumped storage may possibly be an option but that works out pretty much neutral in terms of energy production.
A sensible mix. Utilise the green options where it's practical and sensible to do so but incorporate that with other more reliable options including nuclear.
The deliberate flooding of large parts of mostly southern england
Next time someone refers to the UK as England I'm going to get that wall built again
Hmmm, now that I think about it.........