Zack Polanski. I'm Sorry!!!

Messages
3,168
Name
Russell
Edit My Images
Yes
Just read about the Green Party Leader Zack Polanski being very sorry for not paying his council tax for three years, you or me not paying for three years would have been in court after a year or so.
Just makes me so angry that these MP's seem to get away with breaking the law and then have the nerve to stand up and say how they are going to look after Britain and it's people. How can they expect us to trust any of them? Russ.
 
Nothing more to say than "I agree". :bat:
 
Just read about the Green Party Leader Zack Polanski being very sorry for not paying his council tax for three years, you or me not paying for three years would have been in court after a year or so.
Just makes me so angry that these MP's seem to get away with breaking the law and then have the nerve to stand up and say how they are going to look after Britain and it's people. How can they expect us to trust any of them? Russ.

Probably off his head for those 3 years. Seems he forgot to brush his teeth as well. :hungover:
 
Irony does have a habit of showing itself when those who purport to be the most righteous and morally correct are often caught out.
 
Just read about the Green Party Leader Zack Polanski being very sorry for not paying his council tax for three years, you or me not paying for three years would have been in court after a year or so.
Just makes me so angry that these MP's seem to get away with breaking the law and then have the nerve to stand up and say how they are going to look after Britain and it's people. How can they expect us to trust any of them? Russ.
He isn't an MP.
 
Is that the fine, upstanding member of the (non-existent) Justice Assessment Committee who claimed to be able to offer breast enhancement by brain power and to be a spokesman for the Red Cross?
 
He's not an MP. and he should be treated the same as anyone else by the authorities - not harsher or lenient

And the public need to raise their standard in terms of who they vote for
Perhaps they have and that's why fewer people are bothering to vote.
 
He's not an MP. and he should be treated the same as anyone else by the authorities - not harsher or lenient

And the public need to raise their standard in terms of who they vote for
Rather difficult to do that, though isn't it?
 
It's spreading.

Standards watchdog launches probe into £5m Farage gift​

 
It's spreading.

Standards watchdog launches probe into £5m Farage gift​

Good. Hopefully they'll also look into his other financial dealings, including his involvement in Crypto, his "financial advisory service" and all of the millions that went missing when he closed down his Brexit "Party" Company.
 
It seems to me that being elected to public office requires, at the least, complete honesty.

Surely, being caught out lying should disqualify any candidate from running and result in the immediate removal of an office holder?
 
That would empty both houses in an instant!
 
It seems to me that being elected to public office requires, at the least, complete honesty.

Surely, being caught out lying should disqualify any candidate from running and result in the immediate removal of an office holder?
Well, that would solve the need to refurbish the House of Parliament, there would be nobody available to fill it.
 
Well, that would solve the need to refurbish the House of Parliament, there would be nobody available to fill it.
Unfortunately, I think you are at least partially correct in that.
 
He's not an MP. and he should be treated the same as anyone else by the authorities - not harsher or lenient

And the public need to raise their standard in terms of who they vote for

I think these days and at the next GE this really matters and perhaps it matters more so than it has done for a long long time.

A good friend of ours votes Green. I tried to tell them that the Greens are a very different party these days but I don't think they listened.
 
Last edited:
Just read about the Green Party Leader Zack Polanski being very sorry for not paying his council tax for three years, you or me not paying for three years would have been in court after a year or so.
Just makes me so angry that these MP's seem to get away with breaking the law and then have the nerve to stand up and say how they are going to look after Britain and it's people. How can they expect us to trust any of them? Russ.
This has brought to light the fact that barges / houseboats on leisure moorings do not get charged council tax as, like a motorhome or touring caravan parked on someone's drive, they are not homes and don't stay in one place, whereas if they are on residential moorings (which are very hard to get in a lot of places, the waiting lists are extremely long so most people wanting them buy a boat that comes with a residential mooring already) they are considered permanent dwellings and are assessed for council tax. I have friends with a house that they live in and pay council tax on, and a narrowboat that lives in a marina most of the time but they also spend several weeks each year meandering around canals and rivers on, and which they don't pay council tax on.

If we consider a houseboat on a leisure mooring like a motorhome or touring caravan on someone's drive that no-one is living in full time, should this class of dwelling fall into the scope of council tax or should it not? If they should be treated differently, why? Asking motorhome and touring caravan owners particularly, would you be happy to pay council tax on your mobile dwelling to keep it on your drive? There then becomes a second question about enforcement of leisure moorings as non-residential to ensure no-one is actually using it as their permanent home, which is currently down to the marina, if they care. And if someone lives on a houseboat and tours all the time rather than staying in the same marina, to whom do they pay council tax?
 
A good friend of ours votes Green. I tried to tell them that the Greens are a very different party these days but I don't think they listened.
I was a paid member of the greens for a while there, I liked their views on democracy and on the environment, they didn't have a huge amount money and my monthly sub would help and more Green MPs would be a good thing.
Then they got taken over by the Corbyn supporters and it became populist and all about Trans and Gaza, I left just as this started to turn. I have no issues with these causes at all, but they should be near the bottom of the list of things to do and talk about.
There are a lot of decent and fair individuals in the greens though - but I'd struggle to vote for them now, not even as a protest vote
 
This has brought to light the fact that barges / houseboats on leisure moorings do not get charged council tax as, like a motorhome or touring caravan parked on someone's drive, they are not homes and don't stay in one place, whereas if they are on residential moorings (which are very hard to get in a lot of places, the waiting lists are extremely long so most people wanting them buy a boat that comes with a residential mooring already) they are considered permanent dwellings and are assessed for council tax. I have friends with a house that they live in and pay council tax on, and a narrowboat that lives in a marina most of the time but they also spend several weeks each year meandering around canals and rivers on, and which they don't pay council tax on.

If we consider a houseboat on a leisure mooring like a motorhome or touring caravan on someone's drive that no-one is living in full time, should this class of dwelling fall into the scope of council tax or should it not? If they should be treated differently, why? Asking motorhome and touring caravan owners particularly, would you be happy to pay council tax on your mobile dwelling to keep it on your drive? There then becomes a second question about enforcement of leisure moorings as non-residential to ensure no-one is actually using it as their permanent home, which is currently down to the marina, if they care. And if someone lives on a houseboat and tours all the time rather than staying in the same marina, to whom do they pay council tax?

What happens with regard to council tax if someone has a barge on a residential mooring, but their main residence is a regular house. Would the barge be classed as a second home? That could be seriously expensive considering the second home council tax premium now being enforced in places. Edinburgh is 300%. Yikes!
 
This has brought to light the fact that barges / houseboats on leisure moorings do not get charged council tax as, like a motorhome or touring caravan parked on someone's drive, they are not homes and don't stay in one place, whereas if they are on residential moorings (which are very hard to get in a lot of places, the waiting lists are extremely long so most people wanting them buy a boat that comes with a residential mooring already) they are considered permanent dwellings and are assessed for council tax. I have friends with a house that they live in and pay council tax on, and a narrowboat that lives in a marina most of the time but they also spend several weeks each year meandering around canals and rivers on, and which they don't pay council tax on.

If we consider a houseboat on a leisure mooring like a motorhome or touring caravan on someone's drive that no-one is living in full time, should this class of dwelling fall into the scope of council tax or should it not? If they should be treated differently, why? Asking motorhome and touring caravan owners particularly, would you be happy to pay council tax on your mobile dwelling to keep it on your drive? There then becomes a second question about enforcement of leisure moorings as non-residential to ensure no-one is actually using it as their permanent home, which is currently down to the marina, if they care. And if someone lives on a houseboat and tours all the time rather than staying in the same marina, to whom do they pay council tax?
But this isn't about technicalities is it?
Surely, it's about his moral compass, or lack of. Politicians of all persuasions tend to abuse the financial rules far more than the rest of us. This may or may not be due to them having friends in high places, free legal advice from other politicians, many of which are lawyers, or a sense of entitlement.

But, whatever the reason or reasons, pretty much all legislation exists largely to define what is considered to be right or wrong. Some things are so obviously wrong - murder for example - that there isn't actually any legislation that makes it illegal, it's covered by common law, and we could argue that, if everyone had a strong moral compass then we wouldn't need to have any laws at all, everyone would know the difference between right or wrong.

Everyone has the same legal rights and the same legal constraints, but I believe that politicians should have a stronger moral compass than the rest of us, not a weaker one.
 
It's not as if Polanski tried to fiddle (unlike others) in that particular 200 berth marina only one person had paid council tax in decades, hundreds of people didn't pay. I think they were simply unaware that they should have been paying. Once made aware he paid up.
 
I believe that politicians should have a stronger moral compass than the rest of us, not a weaker one.
I agree with that.

Because the evidence so strongly suggests that the opposite is true, we need some way of policing them, beyond voting them out every few years. Perhaps insist on detailed and proven histories of each candidate, before an election?
 
I agree with that.

Because the evidence so strongly suggests that the opposite is true, we need some way of policing them, beyond voting them out every few years. Perhaps insist on detailed and proven histories of each candidate, before an election?

I certainly agree more people should look into the history/background of candidates before just ticking a party box.
 
I agree with that.

Because the evidence so strongly suggests that the opposite is true, we need some way of policing them, beyond voting them out every few years. Perhaps insist on detailed and proven histories of each candidate, before an election?

It's not the best analogy, but just look at what a bank demands before they will lend a person money, especially for a mortgage. I agree that it don't think it would be too much to ask that we know a little more about the person who is going to have control over billions of our money.
 
I agree with that.

Because the evidence so strongly suggests that the opposite is true, we need some way of policing them, beyond voting them out every few years. Perhaps insist on detailed and proven histories of each candidate, before an election?
Well, if that system was in place we wouldn't have Mr Farage, and probably many more.
 
Back
Top