indeed, i hate the snobbery of unless its a £2k+ canon l lens its rubbish as its not true.
That was shot at 7.1
dalegt4 said:i agree but the amount of people you hear say it is unreal, i do the photos for Paul Hinson who won last years MR2 championships in the 750MC and i had one random joe come up and say
"ooh, what make is that lens then?"
i reply
"sigma 500mm"
He comes back with
"not very good compared to a Nikon or canon lens that mate"
I say
"and what makes you think that then and where is your camera?"
So he just says
"ah i just know mate, ive got a top of the range nikon at home and its much better quality."
ok then well p*ss off i thought seen as im the one being paid and your not.
Some people, unreal the rubbish people talk and for no reason too!
New 60d owner. I've always had an SLR, but for some ridiculous reason I sold my 450D and lenses...... oh what a mistake!
Still, while browsing in Clifton Cameras the other week, the very helpful assistant showed me a used 60d from the window, soon as it was in my hand SOLD!
Looking forward to learning the camera.... just need to decide what lens to get now!
It's hard to say what you are going to use the camera for? 15-85mm is a nice lens, EF 24-105 IS USM better or 18-135mm for value
I'd consider the 17-55 IS as well. It's wider and faster if you can live without the long end.Will be using camera for a bit of everything really, think I'm going to look for a used 24-105
I'd consider the 17-55 IS as well. It's wider and faster if you can live without the long end.
benjamminj said:Will be using camera for a bit of everything really, think I'm going to look for a used 24-105
Don't worry, they're great. You won't regret itWell, I've ordered the 17-55 2.8 today, I'm a bit worried about it not being long enough, but everywhere I look this lens gets highly talked about so what the hell - fingers crossed lol!
thinking of getting myself a 60d in a couple of weeks chaps, one question id like to ask is what its like at higher iso's (1600+)
thinking of getting myself a 60d in a couple of weeks chaps, one question id like to ask is what its like at higher iso's (1600+)
In my experience 1600 is usually pretty good, 3200 is where it starts to break up but is sometimes OK, and 6400 is usually pretty poor. It does depend on what you're shooting though.They are superb i find, I am testing mine at present within testing conditions under harsh light and find it personally to be more than good.
With som pp I find 3200 is more than usuable, 1600 perfectly fine and if on smaller images, i.e not a huge print i would go so far as to say 6400 is usable too.
I wouldnt want to use 6400 ever to be honest as detail is lacking and noise is prominant but i would be more than happy to shoot at 3200 then clean it up if needed.
thinking of getting myself a 60d in a couple of weeks chaps, one question id like to ask is what its like at higher iso's (1600+)
Anymore pictures? this thread is on the 4 page of the fourm it seems to be lost
I have loooads and loads but dont want to annoy everyone with them. haha
the red arrows, I love this and its been a massive hit for me with people..
Sorry about the low res and small size but after having someone rip off and downlaoad one of my images i'm uploading smaller res files from now.:thumbsdown:
Nice pictures of the Red Arrows but what lens do you use
Multitude of ones fella as I usually take both my bodies with me when I am out and about.
Most of the time though I use the big 500mm for planes etc.
Why's that mate?
I have a Canon 350 d camera and want to upgrade to either 600d or 60d canon what is the difference and can I use my lenses ?