- Messages
- 18,233
- Name
- David
- Edit My Images
- Yes
No idea. If I got a 25 1.8, I think I'd miss the wide end. And there's no way I can run to £750+ for a lens as this is just a hobby..
I do like Paul's shots with his 75mm but I like macro so maybe a 60mm 2.8 is an option for me. And the 75-300 appeals too..
It's the price difference on the wider quick lenses that's a killer
Just been to the local camera shop - they don't stock olympus as the owner thinks they might be a flash in the pan So he showed me the e-x1 instead. Quite nice but not balanced, even with just the kit lens on..
Hmmm
eh!?!?, so the owner does not stock m43rds as they might be a flash in the pan but stock Fuji X.. bonkers.. sounds like owner might not have an Olympus account.
I do like Paul's shots with his 75mm but I like macro so maybe a 60mm 2.8 is an option for me. And the 75-300 appeals too..
It's the price difference on the wider quick lenses that's a killer
I liked the silver but thought it looked a bit cheaper - as this was £70 cheaper I wasn't too worried though !
But the two body colour options are the same price.
I got mine for £599 including the power zoom - they only had the black though
I got a bargain too...body only though.
Silver E-M10 listed as used turned out to be brand new (the kit lens had been split from the kit, hence the used tag) for £399. Seriously, it's brand-spanking new and now fully registered with Olympus, getting the additional warranty.
Couldn't be happier.
I got a bargain too...body only though.
Silver E-M10 listed as used turned out to be brand new (the kit lens had been split from the kit, hence the used tag) for £399. Seriously, it's brand-spanking new and now fully registered with Olympus, getting the additional warranty.
Couldn't be happier.
That's a brilliant price I swapped my kit lens for a 12-32 which suits be better - all for £599 so I'm chuffed with that
Just need to add a 40-150 and a fast prime now......
Yes, right place, right time...unusually for me!
I've got three lenses, 14mm f/2.5, 25mm f/1.8 and 45mm f/1.8. I'm after the 40-150mm too as well as the 60mm macro....ideally I'd like the 75mm as well but a) want to get used to the kit I've got and probably more importantly, b) my wife would officially castrate me!
Steve
I'm late to this party... I went for the 75 over the 60 after much agonising, but the DoF and bokeh are worth it. I use some cheap ebay extension rings with the 45 f1.8 for macro with fair results, but I'm much more into people than bugs. I rarely use the 40-150 - whenever I did I just regretted that I hadn't put the 75 on and cropped.
It looks to me as if its cooking the RAWs with some noise reduction even when Noise Filter is OFF.Seeing the way the em-10 handles high ISO. It looks much much better than the d7000 I have
It looks to me as if its cooking the RAWs with some noise reduction even when Noise Filter is OFF.
This was suggested in some Sony NEX cameras too : using the same sensor as the Nikon D7000
I wouldn't worry : D7000 RAWs take nice NR in post anyway, the E-M10 sensor cannot physically do better, so something else is going on here.
thank you mate, the moss on the ground made the wood so surreal, it was bouncy to walk overSaw these yesterday mate, very nice indeed.