joescrivens
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 15,052
- Name
- Joe
- Edit My Images
- Yes
of course had it been suarez that had done it, you lot would be stringing him up and defending the ball boy
of course had it been suarez that had done it, you lot would be stringing him up and defending the ball boy
And quite rightly so.
That could be deemed trolling, Tommy.
modern football in a nutshell
of course had it been suarez that had done it, you lot would be stringing him up and defending the ball boy
I'd momentarily forgotten about the evil Luis Found his facebook page though:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0V4LqS_sh8g
of course had it been suarez that had done it, you lot would be stringing him up and defending the ball boy
Yes, Hazard shouldn't have done this. No question.
But can we stop defending the actions of the ball boy. Many talk of him being a boy. Well, he's not. He's 17 years old and a full time prat. He announced beforehand that he was recalled to be a ball boy on the night, that this would be his last match as a ball boy and that he would be timewasting. I think Swansea club have some questions that need to be answered. Do they condone timewasting tactics by their ball boys? Wow, this is a tactic that even Fergie hasn't employed to date (but watch this space ).
Despite what the third-rate pathetic excuses for sports journos we have to put up with in this country have to say, Hazard didn't intend to kick the prat. His intention, clearly, was to kick the ball out from under him and, from having re-watched all the videos, this appears to be what happened. The ball clearly pops out from the other side of the prat and Hazard jumps over him to grab the ball.
Prat then goes into drama-queen mode.
Of course Hazard shouldn't have done this and I suspect he'll be punished well beyond what might be considered appropriate. But those who understand the great game will also understand the immense frustrations generated by the prat's actions at the end of this cup game. Those who don't understand the great game will only read what they want to read in the press.
To be fair though, Suarez would have verbally abused him, had a bite of him, then kicked him and claimed for a penalty due to the contact made
Rodgers would defend him to the hilt, but then go mad when Suazrez admitted he was in the wrong 6 months later
2blue4u said:Yes, Hazard shouldn't have done this. No question.
But can we stop defending the actions of the ball boy. Many talk of him being a boy. Well, he's not. He's 17 years old and a full time prat. He announced beforehand that he was recalled to be a ball boy on the night, that this would be his last match as a ball boy and that he would be timewasting. I think Swansea club have some questions that need to be answered. Do they condone timewasting tactics by their ball boys? Wow, this is a tactic that even Fergie hasn't employed to date (but watch this space ).
Despite what the third-rate pathetic excuses for sports journos we have to put up with in this country have to say, Hazard didn't intend to kick the prat. His intention, clearly, was to kick the ball out from under him and, from having re-watched all the videos, this appears to be what happened. The ball clearly pops out from the other side of the prat and Hazard jumps over him to grab the ball.
Prat then goes into drama-queen mode.
Of course Hazard shouldn't have done this and I suspect he'll be punished well beyond what might be considered appropriate. But those who understand the great game will also understand the immense frustrations generated by the prat's actions at the end of this cup game. Those who don't understand the great game will only read what they want to read in the press.
I think Swansea club have some questions that need to be answered. Do they condone timewasting tactics by their ball boys? Wow, this is a tactic that even Fergie hasn't employed to date (but watch this space ).
Or even worse
I'm reading the ball boy's dad is a man called Martin Morgan, owner of Morgan's Hotel. Where are the Chelsea team staying tonight? Morgan's Hotel. Amazing!
Edit: Not true, see below.
Even better, another Martin Morgan is a director at Swansea City and a 25% shareholder which I've read could also be his dad.
Both could be a load of bull, but if true I love it
Edit: Here we are http://www.thisissouthwales.co.uk/S...llboy-Hazard/story-17940358-detail/story.html He is the son of the director. I love it
Adding 10 secs wouldn't make up for the frustration the wee ****er caused and he should be punished in some way
Is Martin Morgan hotelier not the same Martin Morgan boardmember?
Or worse, still :bonk:
onion breath?
Byker......kids have been mimicking their idols for years...it is nothing new. The amount they get paid has nothing to do with it. (I never understand why that is brought into the equation)
But the play acting is getting worse, especially after the last two seasons. Why arent we surprised when others do it when they see the players do it week in, week out to get an advantage.
If there's anything ruining the game, it's the play acting. I'd love to see the FA take a strong stance, especially in the premiership but also with the other leagues. All matches are televised now. The FA should summon the players Monday morning - right explain that ungentlemanly conduct.
It'll never happen though. I don't think the FA have the balls, they certainly can't handle anything at speed.
How Suarez takes free kicks
How Suarez takes free kicks
[YOUTUBE]XESzp14zuAo[/YOUTUBE]
What's that got to do with
Unless my eyesight is failing me that wasn't suarez :shrug:
Humour fail!
Humour fail!
Hook, line and sinker.
What's that got to do with
Humour fail!
Understanding fail.
If we're putting random videos up and claiming them to be someone else. :shrug: Hilarious, not.