It must have been.....no real danger there, I'll stick with my 5D....don't think I'd even consider swapping it for the new D3. Not that I have anything against Nikon now :gag:
Yes, I go one about 8 months ago when I bought my Mac and 23" TFT...and it makes a huge difference, and allows you to make more accurate edits as well as judgements on others photos. But you've got to calibrate it every 2/3 weeks.
Sharpness, yea it took me a while to master sharp images, the essential items being a tripod, but what made a difference for me was when I discovered the Mirror Lock...some say it makes little to no difference...well I beg to differ...with a good lens, mirror lock can make all the difference and...
Some of my fav water shots.
1.
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/202/498337976_afe180ef3f_b.jpg
2.
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/206/488080125_8b1a1f2fc6_b.jpg
3.
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/197/498407757_ee42bab9c9_b.jpg
Thanks for the attempt, but you simply can't pull back detail that ain't there, you just end up with a low qaulity image that looks far from natural. It was intentional anyway. Had I wanted a nicely balanced image, I'd have used just a CP filter or a 0.3 ND grad and used AV comp if required.
So you missed the foreground light, the blue sky, and strange bright ball in the sky.....fair enough, can like em all. Under-exposure is intentional to get silloette.....I used a 0.9 ND filter to get the effect.
I use a hardware calibrator (the Spyder 2Pro) which basically calibrates your monitor to your chossen colour profile e.g. sRGB or Adobe RGB 1998, I choose to use sRGB and also set my camera to use this colour space for consistancy, something you also need to set in photoshop also.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.