D
Deleted member 88563
Guest
My next purchase is going to be a 300mm 2.8, but I'm not sure what to choose. I shoot with a Canon 7D MkII and have a 70-200 2.8 and mostly shoot football mostly Womens and Non-League and looking for a lens to maybe to use in years to come shooting higher level football.
I have used the Sigma 120-300 before and really liked it, found it really sharp and kind of liked the ability to zoom. However, I have always read how a prime is always sharper and just wondering if an older version prime would be better than a newer zoom?
I believe the Canon would be cheaper being the older lens but just wondering if paying a bit more for the Sigma, I would be getting more for my money.
Has anyone used both lenses or one or the other and can recommend and maybe give pros and cons?
Thank you
I have used the Sigma 120-300 before and really liked it, found it really sharp and kind of liked the ability to zoom. However, I have always read how a prime is always sharper and just wondering if an older version prime would be better than a newer zoom?
I believe the Canon would be cheaper being the older lens but just wondering if paying a bit more for the Sigma, I would be getting more for my money.
Has anyone used both lenses or one or the other and can recommend and maybe give pros and cons?
Thank you