The Amazing Sony A1/A7/A9/APS-C & Anything else welcome Mega Thread!

Last edited:
@Ed Sutton
Nice I prefer the b+w personally not sure which program you used I was thinking Silver efex or similar for lots of contrast

What do you think of it?
 
Me and my Brother went on a Caterham Drifting Experience yesterday, weather was appalling but it was great fun. Those cars are tiny, they had to take the seat out for me to fit in :ROFLMAO:

Unbeknown to me my brother took some shots with my camera, he wasn't aware I'd dropped the shutter speed to 1/80 and that it was BBF but thankfully with a bit of help from Topaz Sharpen I've got a couple of usable images of me in the car too :clap: I didn't actually take many photos as I was taking video instead, unfortunately it was so windy you can't hear the car's engine over the wind noise :headbang:

Extra motion has been added to these in photoshop as even at 1/80 motion blur was minimal.

1.

A1_00422-Edit by Toby Gunnee, on Flickr

2.

A1_00453-Edit by Toby Gunnee, on Flickr

3.

A1_00683-Edit by Toby Gunnee, on Flickr

4.

A1_00688-Edit by Toby Gunnee, on Flickr

5.

A1_00783-Edit by Toby Gunnee, on Flickr

6. And one from the iPhone

IMG_0681-Edit by Toby Gunnee, on Flickr
 
Last edited:
@Ed Sutton
Nice I prefer the b+w personally not sure which program you used I was thinking Silver efex or similar for lots of contrast

What do you think of it?
I'm not a big fan of black and white TBH, so it's not something I do very often.

I just did it in Lightroom. with a couple of tweaks.:(
 
As it's quiet on here a couple of photos from me testing the cropping ability of the A7RV and the 70-350mm lens when a red kite flew by. Also a photo of my best friend Hugo. He is coming up to 14 years old in a month or so and is camera shy generally. I should have been better with more foreground and not clipping his paws.

Red Kite by Swansea Jack, on Flickr


Hugo. by Swansea Jack, on Flickr
 
Last edited:
7Artisan 40mm f2.5 review.


I bought my Sony 40mm f2.5 before the cheaper alternatives came out but I bought the TTA 40mm f2 for the wider aperture but sadly it had issues on my camera and went back. It's "issue" with the cheaper brands which worry me and also some Chinese makes don't seem to have got to grips very well with flare as it seems to be a common criticism in reviews.
 
The rumor site says there's a bunch of new cameras coming in the next few months.


Anyone waiting for anything?

I think the only thing that could interest me is an A7cIII with the do everything back screen and 1/8,000 shutter or auto switching to the electronic shutter above 1/4,000.
 
The rumor site says there's a bunch of new cameras coming in the next few months.


Anyone waiting for anything?

I think the only thing that could interest me is an A7cIII with the do everything back screen and 1/8,000 shutter or auto switching to the electronic shutter above 1/4,000.

I just bought an A7cii, so this is the most likely announcement.
 
A new A7R6 is most likely followed by new A7C, series camera bodies maybe even an A1III.
 
The rumor site says there's a bunch of new cameras coming in the next few months.


Anyone waiting for anything?

I think the only thing that could interest me is an A7cIII with the do everything back screen and 1/8,000 shutter or auto switching to the electronic shutter above 1/4,000.
I’m not waiting or for anything, and I’m a bit ‘concerned’ that future bodies are going to have the grip of the A1II and A9III meaning it’s highly likely I’ll stick with the A1 for a very long time.
 
I’m not waiting or for anything, and I’m a bit ‘concerned’ that future bodies are going to have the grip of the A1II and A9III meaning it’s highly likely I’ll stick with the A1 for a very long time.
I hope they all do I love the A9III ergonomics.
 
As it's quiet and just for fun...

I saw this on the rumor site...


We had a meal in a restaurant opposite that Thai temple and of course I took pictures of it with my A7cII and Sony 40mm. I took some single shots and I did a couple of panoramas.

1-Thailand-22-11-25-7.jpg

1-Thailand-22-11-25-8.jpg

The view and the company were excellent but the pizza was rubbish and cold. Oh well :D

I think it's Wot Arun, The Temple of Dawn, in Bangkok. The traffic was epic.
 
Last edited:
Are you processing these or is that the colours you are getting straight out of the A75? The colours seem very flat. I don't remember the 50 f/1.8 being so flat.
Processing. It's taken me a while to knock the contrast out of Sony files and I still can't tame the viewfinder's excess contrast!
 
I can’t see this being true, there’s no need for the A1 series if they do this. Also wording like “professional AI Autofocus” makes me think it’s fake.

IMG_3151.png
 
I can’t see this being true, there’s no need for the A1 series if they do this. Also wording like “professional AI Autofocus” makes me think it’s fake.

View attachment 478343
It would make sense if they give the A1 III a global shutter.

Although I think it’s more likely that the A7R6 will get a partially stacked sensor.
 
Last edited:
It would make sense if they give the A1 III a global shutter.

Although I think it’s more likely that the A7R6 will get a partially stacked sensor.
True, but they'd likely wait until an A1 with global shutter is out I think. Also, wording like "professional" AI autofocus makes me think it's bogus, nobody descibes AF as professional, hobbyist etc.

I wonder if they'll ever put the drive dial on the the A7 series and R series, I use that a lot.
 
True, but they'd likely wait until an A1 with global shutter is out I think. Also, wording like "professional" AI autofocus makes me think it's bogus, nobody descibes AF as professional, hobbyist etc.

I wonder if they'll ever put the drive dial on the the A7 series and R series, I use that a lot.
The drive dial is one of the things they use to differentiate between prosumer and pro bodies so would be surprised to see that on any of the A7 series bodies.
 
Processing. It's taken me a while to knock the contrast out of Sony files and I still can't tame the viewfinder's excess contrast!

I'd have thought high contrast was rather a lens thing than a camera thing?
 
I'd have thought high contrast was rather a lens thing than a camera thing?
High contrast and horribly vivid colours - definitely the electronics.

I've set the picture profile to something less garish and the EVF and screen look much better and the files still process OK. I can understand why some people refuse to move to mirrorless from OVF cameras.
 
High contrast and horribly vivid colours - definitely the electronics.

I've set the picture profile to something less garish and the EVF and screen look much better and the files still process OK. I can understand why some people refuse to move to mirrorless from OVF cameras.

This isn't something I've come across. Are these jpeg's or raws?

Imo the Sony cameras I've had have given a pretty neutral and even subdued look as opposed to some other brands which give a more coloured output and by coloured I mean affected, removed from reality.

On ovf v evf, I'd only go back with a gun to my head as ovf's are too limiting for me, for me evf's have too many advantages but we're all free to choose.
 
This isn't something I've come across. Are these jpeg's or raws?

Imo the Sony cameras I've had have given a pretty neutral and even subdued look as opposed to some other brands which give a more coloured output and by coloured I mean affected, removed from reality.

On ovf v evf, I'd only go back with a gun to my head as ovf's are too limiting for me, for me evf's have too many advantages but we're all free to choose.
It has nothing to do with the files which look fine and I have nothing against EVFs as a viewing option (although I still consider their benefits marginal).

It's what I'm seeing in the A7V EVF that is awful. But I seem to have just about got it sorted now.
 
It has nothing to do with the files which look fine and I have nothing against EVFs as a viewing option (although I still consider their benefits marginal).

It's what I'm seeing in the A7V EVF that is awful. But I seem to have just about got it sorted now.
Sony EVF's aren't the best imo, I don't like how they go 'grainy' when you're autofocussing. I can't say I've noticed oversaturation or anything with mine, it looks quite natural to me. Of course, this will be user dependant.

I've never liked Sony profiles and is one of the reasons I don't shoot jpeg. For a long time I used color fidelity profiles but lately I've been using adobe ones as I like how the reds look in adobe.
 
It has nothing to do with the files which look fine and I have nothing against EVFs as a viewing option (although I still consider their benefits marginal).

It's what I'm seeing in the A7V EVF that is awful. But I seem to have just about got it sorted now.

It has nothing to do with the files and you have nothing against evf's?

In the post I first responded to you said it had taken you time to knock the contrast out of Sony files and you later said you understood why some people refuse to move to mirrorless so I'm now a bit confused what your issues were but if they're sorted now I wish you luck going forward.
 
Sony EVF's aren't the best imo, I don't like how they go 'grainy' when you're autofocussing. I can't say I've noticed oversaturation or anything with mine, it looks quite natural to me. Of course, this will be user dependant.

I've never liked Sony profiles and is one of the reasons I don't shoot jpeg. For a long time I used color fidelity profiles but lately I've been using adobe ones as I like how the reds look in adobe.
The A73 EVF was OK out of the box.
 
Guys, if I shoot in crop/apsc mode in RAW, do I end up with just the cropped apsc image in LR or full size?

I know if I shoot in 16:9 RAW I do actually end up with the full 3:2 image if I want it.
If you shoot in crop you only get the crop image, but regardless of the ratio you shoot in I believe you will always get the 3:2 in raw.
 
Back
Top